(I’m looking at you, open source projects who direct their community to Discord)

This is surprisingly very common. Even for stuff that prioritise privacy. The interesting part is why discord is kept under the covers by everyone - despite its security offences, and anti-user practices.

There isn’t much talk about discord like there is about browsers. However, it might be just an undeveloped branch of the oss community.

What’s your setup?

Government when the elites use loopholes and do devious shit:

I sleep

Government when the peasants use loopholes:

Straight to jail

Different kinds of alcohol is just different flavours of hand sanitiser.

First, they use the most questionable tech. Then they will blame it on tech in general.

Greedy politicians will unfortunately continue the onslaught of these laws, until their plans are fulfilled.

The children they said, the children - All just a big wrapper for destruction of society by big greed.

“Why do you care if you have nothing to hide?”

Government: hides their plans

The children they deem to protect are trembling in fear right now.

This reminds me of the dating subreddits

Also torrents can be much faster & secure than direct downloads/mirrors.

To answer this, no they are not perfectly rational. However they are not dumb, anyone can be a rapist, it is a mental disorder which doesn’t correlate with their IQ.

The ‘tons of reasons’ statement would be interesting to read about, as usually a perpetrators focus is rape and escape. Not befriending the victim - i might suggest how inconsistent this sounds.

Unless the victim has other mental problems then this could occur. However, I was simply seeking an answer, not an explosive statement.

The question was why he didn’t do it sooner. Not when confronted.

If he knew he did something wrong, illegal, and immoral then why did he stay and wait until the victim wakes up.

Thanks for replying. I do see that there is some incompatibility with both our proof. However, I do realise that you’re talking about perpetrators which are close to the victim - and that may yield a different response to that of a random person/ newly met person.

Suffice to say, it does make sense that persons closest to the victim would be the perpetrator.

I don’t know if he wants to be called bean anymore… as now he shall be called grape.

[Article answers second paragraph]

Thought that an exclaimer will work for some ignorant people but that’s how stuff works.

And I am also interested of why are you so deliberated of calling this ‘stupid shit’, and ‘awful take’? I know I have put it in words wrong and next time I’ll do it better, but I assure you fail to read and understand my comment first.

I’ll refrain from deleting this as I know there are people who understand what I wrote.

Oh sorry forgot the question mark there. My bad.

Hi, to answer your question I’d like to ask what convoluted reason did I state?

It’s nice to see you replied to my comment, and the last part of my comment was just a question which I am confused about.

And sorry for coming across as not believing. You could consider that serious accusations shouldn’t be based on beliefs - but facts.

Thanks for highlighting the parts of the article. The thing that can be ruled out is that there isn’t clinical proof of the sexsomnia. So there is a low chance of her having it. The man may have raped her. however, why didn’t he run away sooner. Usually perpetrators escape after the abuse.

Interesting. The situation really puts into perspective how both genders have it difficult. It can really rule out anything, if the man really raped her, the woman caused a fake accusation or it was just a big misunderstanding.

Firstly, the woman who was suspected to have sexsomnia, did she really have sexsomnia? And what evidence did the research facility produce?

Secondly, the man who is blamed to have raped her, if consent was given while she was deemed as fully awake, then why is this situation occurring? Did he fail to realise she is not fully awake?

COPPA is a joke sometimes, they don’t really protect and like other American orgs it probably is lobbied.

The best case would be to protect everyone’s privacy, not just the children OR teens. And if they wanted to help then they would’ve outlined other orgs like Facebook - but that’s an American org.