• Eager EagleEnglish
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago
    edit-2
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    yet another useless feature annoyance

    Android already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.

    • m-p{3}English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Which is a sensible choice security-wise.

      • Eager EagleEnglish
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung is introducing

        • koraEnglish
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          3 months ago
          edit-2
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung 's Version of Android is introducing.

            • koraEnglish
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Thatsthejoke.jpg

              Sorta

              I’m just pointing out that the entirety of Samsung’s Android adds literally nothing of value to the user to the android experience and only serves to, at best, annoy. Not just this one particular feature.

              • breadsmasherEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                I think perhaps something has gone wrong with the phrasing or something, because it seemed you were saying the exact same thing but less clearly?

                https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/dead19c1-bf8d-4df6-98e0-6d0d3c8c25bf.jpeg

                it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung*'s Version of Android* is

                which now I edit that so it doesn’t have a strike through I actually understand what you mean. It was a bit difficult to parse that originally

      • ZakEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        edit-2
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Is it? Android already disables sideloading by default, requires each source to ask for permission, and prompts the user before each install. How does Samsung’s additional setting improve security?

      • WeLoveCastingSpellzEnglish
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        no. the notion that sideloading is bad for security is apple propaganda

      • BeaverEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Apple should take this approach

    • helenslunchEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Android already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.

      no, it doesn’t?

        • helenslunchEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago
          edit-2
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Explains what? This is not something that requires an explanation.

    • cordlesslampEnglish
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Came here to say exactly this. Dumb rage bait.

    • Virkkunen
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It is also only enabled by default on new phones and during OOBE setup there’s a toggle for this.

    • IlandarEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I think that’s just the nature of smartphone related journalism at the moment. It’s sort of a reflection of where the industry is at: lacking substance and focused on short-termism above all else. In the media this translates to a never-ending hype circle around the latest releases, rumours and “leaks”. Everything else has some clickbait name and a bunch of poorly written, irrelevant filler to pad out the “article” for SEO purposes.

      • helenslunchEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        edit-2
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I mean this goes for “news” in general.

        Some days are slower than others. If you’re not producing “news”, you’re not making money.

        What do you do? Fabricate “news” whenever you can.

    • Eager EagleEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The question in the title is just a hook, but this is still an article, not a Q&A.

      The text tells why the feature matters, tells it’s redundant, lists the phones affected by it, echoes some Samsung notes about the feature, and answers the question. It’s a report on a particular feature, I wouldn’t call it a filler.

  • grueEnglish
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink
    1. Return the Samsung phone
    2. Buy from a company that isn’t hostile towards its customers
  • janNatanEnglish
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    1.) Don’t buy a Samsung phone

    • mudmaniacEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      My last Samsung phone was the Galaxy S1

      • ReversalHatcheryEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Besides what the other user said, they recently made it a requirement for accredited phone services that they destroy any samsung phones along with their data, that they receive for servicing, if they have found that the user has done “unauthorized servicing” on it.
        This is the next step after making the phones practically impossible to be disassembled, which they have done years ago.

      • helenslunchEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Not gonna speak for anyone else but it’s all the bloatware and spyware for me.

  • ObsidianZedEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What are some of the best alternatives? With comparable specs (in the US)?

    Right now I have a Fold and honestly really like the foldables. Though I think the Pixel Fold is my only alternative there.

    • unrushed233English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I think the Pixel Fold might be the best option for a foldable phone, because (just like all other Pixels) you can flash it with a private, secure, open-source ROM like GrapheneOS.

    • lemmyvoreEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      edit-2
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If you mean the S24, the equivalent from Sony would be the Xperia 5 V. Has audio jack and sd card compared to the S24, Sony batteries last 2 days even after several years of use thanks to excellent optimization and battery care, there’s almost zero bloat. On the downside it will only get 2 years of upgrades (until the end of 2025). Also you can’t unlock the bootloader on US models if that’s something you care about.

      https://gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=12773&idPhone2=12534

    • helenslunchEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Motorola makes the clamshell fold. Seems to be a lot better value as well. Can’t speak to all the bloatware and other anti-consumer shitfuckery because I’ve never seen a reviewer that thinks it’s important.

    • IlandarEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I believe you can purchase the OnePlus Open in the US. It’s listed on their US website and I have heard of people living in the US using it.