• BalinaresEnglish
    arrow-up
    222
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Could we, like, leave the clickbait headlines to reddit? Thanks. The queer.af admins just decided – wisely – not to renew the domain considering who the fee would go to.

    • Hal-5700XOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The queer.af admins just decided – wisely – not to renew the domain considering who the fee would go to.

      So the Taliban being in control of the .af domain. Made the admins not to renew the instance. To put in away, “The instance has been killed by the Taliban..

      • FlickOfTheBeanEnglish
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        No. The instance being killed by the taliban is the opposite of that is happening here.

        The taliban has done nothing, in this case. The admins of the instance have chosen not to keep the instance due to not wanting to fund the taliban in anyway.

        This phrasing fucks up which way the action flows, which is important for a headline to get right to remain accurate to the story. Does that make sense?

      • heyoniEnglish
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nope. That’s extremely misleading.

      • Da_BoomEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nah the admins killed the instance before the Taliban could at best, kill it, at worse proxy it and gather information.

        Seriously gaining control of a domain can allow you to do pretty nefarious things.

  • FizzEnglish
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Reading that headline scared me. For a moment I thought the instance owner was killed by the Taliban.

  • isoEnglish
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Another reason to not use ccTLDs.

    • QuokkaEnglish
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If the Taliban take over Australia I’ve got bigger issues to worry about than my domain name.

      • katy ✨English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        that’s why australia has their army of spiders

        • FunwayguyEnglish
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          God help us all if we have to break out the Emus

      • isoEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah that’s true. We just need to research who owns the TLD before long-term site and everything is ok.

      • nintendiatorEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Better to just setup your own ccTLD, for maximum trust.

        (honestly only half joking)

          • 4z01235English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I’m sure Google didn’t buy those for the purpose of actually using them, but rather to prevent someone else from registering and using them.

              • Echo DotEnglish
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                9 months ago
                edit-2
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                It’s Google, probably just bought them on the off chance that they would ever do anything with them.

                They are a company where the left hand doesn’t talk to the right hand very often anyway.

              • 4z01235English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Two businesses can trademark the same name if they are operating in different industries. Or, the name could have spaces or punctuation that renders the same as a TLD.

                Go Ogle Photographic & Paparazzi Inc. could have a reasonable claim to the same .google TLD. The registration fee is chump change for Google/Alphabet to make sure this can’t happen.

      • Echo DotEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        .io is the British Indian ocean’s territory, probably not really a risk i doubt anything’s going to happen there.

    • radixEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What alternatives are there? Just the big .org, .com, .net ones?

      • Carighan MaconarEnglish
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Just use .net or so. Or make it dependent on where you host, so .fi or .de or .us or whatever. TLDs aren’t just for lulz, and getting specific country ones just for “funny” combinations just leads to stuff like this happening.

        • TheInsane42English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          No need to limit yourself to US tld’s, country ones for funny domains can be stable as well. My domain koffie.nu (coffee.now in Dutch), registered in '98, is still going strong. I just hope the rising sealevel won’t wipe away the country any time soon.

          • FierySpectreEnglish
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Meer info over koffie zal in 1999 worden toegevoegd

            Lies

            • TheInsane42English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Yep, never came to updating the site, it’s my email/network domain. Maybe Imshould change the 1 into a 2 ;)

      • Deceptichum
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        So many now, it’s opened up to at least like 100 or more words now.

  • CrypticCoffeeEnglish
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If you’re on the country code, you open yourself up to risk. ml has been a risk before.

    Your headline is misleading though. Taliban didn’t kill it. Admin did.

    • VictorEnglish
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Such a heinous click bait, I’m inclined to down vote the post. Definitely misleading af.

    • Hal-5700XOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If the Taliban never got control of the .af domain in the first place. The Admin would have renew it. So the Taliban did kill it.

      • CrypticCoffeeEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Well, they run Afghanistan and af is the country code. They picked a domain that they thought was cute, funny or clever and didn’t consider longevity or risk. It’s on them. If I make a website. I won’t pick a silly extension that won’t survive long.

    • katy ✨English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      .ck is only available as subdomains - including the hilarious, co.ck.

    • NekkoDroidEnglish
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Wouldn’t that need them to get the fu.ck domain itself? I have a feeling that is already used by someone else, but there currently isn’t any website at that domain (doesn’t mean it isnt used)

      • LvxferreEnglish
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Worst hypothesis they just need to mess around a bit. For example I don’t think that queerasfu.ck would be registered.

    • AdamEnglish
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Activitypub makes it next to impossible to “move” an instance to a new domain.

      Every post/comment/and user is uniquely identified using the domain. In the eyes of ActivityPub changing the domain just makes each of those things a completely new thing.

      You can set up a new service at your new domain and potentially get most all your users to migrate but they’ll be leaving behind their entire histories and as a “new” fediverse user they’ll only be discoverable via the historical posts for as long as the original server is reachable.

      • nintendiatorEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Thats IMO one of the worst engineering decisions in the protocol, besides all the others, but this one (making identity depend on domains, meaning on third parties antithetical to decentralization) is laughable. Who was responsible for it?

        • AdamEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          But, the theory goes, you’re not supposed to be reliant on third parties as you should be in control of your own domain (or within a few degrees of the person who is).

          Large instances are what are antithetical to decentralisation.

          Of course, the reality of it is that, it just hasn’t worked out like that.

      • RBGEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yes, that was a big issue for fmhy.ml too

      • LvxferreEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Damn, that’s sad. Thank you for the info.

      • NekuSoulEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Not sure how well this would actually work, but couldn’t the admins “copy” the instance to the new domain and then initiate an account migration from the old to the new instance for every account? That should both push out the account transfer to all the other instances and preserve the post history as well.

  • gianniEnglish
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    That’s quite an intentionally misleading headline @hal_5700X@lemmy.world

  • Matriks404English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Why would you want to use .af TLD anyway?

  • cumEnglish
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What a bad taste title

    • Hal-5700XOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What a bad taste title

      For whoThe Taliban?

      • cumEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That it’s objectively false to stir up attention

        Your title implies it was directly killed, when it factually was not.

  • flamingo_pinyataEnglish
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They could have renewed it just for the irony. Even if it means giving some money to the Taliban.