• NixEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    It looks like ani.social they have a rule to forbid the content though might have just been posts that weren’t reported

  • MicrowEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    allegedly

    A bit weird that they didnt want proof of misconduct, but hey

  • kaboom36English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’ve been on this instance for a about a month now, and I’ve not seen anything remotely like that

    It would not shock me in the least if the reason this instance was put on that list was because of one of those “all weebs are pedos” jerks

    • DarkThoughts
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Remember when a bunch of instances banned nsfwlemmy because they allegedly allowed pedo content, when in truth they just decided to not moderate fictional characters where the age was not obvious (like potentially 18, but plus / minus a couple years)?

      I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues instead of chasing ghosts, because that instance is a toxic cesspool of assholes and disinformation.

      • cacheson
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues

        As much as I would love to see it, I don’t think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.