• Atelopus-zeteki
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    X has “reportedly worked with Donald Trump’s campaign to censor material that could be harmful to the former president’s White House chances as part of a pattern of election interference that is unprecedented in U.S. history, according to The Daily Beast.

    Gee willikers, that sure sounds like it would be illegal. I mean if I were to do this sort of thing, I’m imagining I would be in jail, awaiting trial.

    18 U.S. Code Chapter 29 - ELECTIONS AND POLITICAL ACTIVITIES https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-29

    Overview of Federal Criminal Laws Prohibiting Interference with Voting https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB11125

    • FuglyDuckEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Gee willikers, that sure sounds like it would be illegal. I mean if I were to do this sort of thing, I’m imagining I would be in jail, awaiting trial.

      as far as I can tell, none of those laws apply to censorship on what is ultimately a private company’s platform.

      Like twitter isn’t a government agency. they’re allowed to be partisan and delete content however they see fit. This would be similar to, say, a newspaper electing to not cover trump’s awkward moments while covering Harris’ awkward moments; or a bakery offering pro-harris cake or cookies but not pro-trump stuff.

      the constitution only bars government or public agents from infringing on free speech- it does not bar you from kicking your asshat trumper out of thanksgiving dinner.

      so far, the only thing I can see that Musk has done that is against election law is to solicit donors with the $47 he promised to recruiters, so to speak and that’s well I’m not sure that’s going to be an easy case to win.

  • 4oremanEnglish
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    ok, but what consequences will he actually face ; nothing.

  • zanteEnglish
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Rich people buy media to advance their agenda.

    Up next, you won’t believe where this bear shits.

  • Asafum
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    edit-2
    4 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Magoos: “Twitter did it to Trump before Musk so it’s ok! Revenge is our bread and butter! Watch me drink liberal tears and laugh over something that enraged me previously! Gratification is more important than integrity!

  • phoenixz
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Elon Musk will be bankrupt within three years and at this speed, likely jailed as well

    • madcaesar
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      You have no idea how much money these fuckers have. He pissed away 40 billion and it literally changed NOTHING in his life. Once you are a billionaire it’s harder to go bankrupt than make more money.

  • stringere
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Isn’t this similar to working with the Enquirer. Y’know that whole thing where he was convicted for 34 felonies. Guess we’ll get another conviction and no justice 4 years from now?

  • blarth
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    The main thing that gives X relevance is sports media and corporate communications. If they all move elsewhere, X would turn into an echo chamber like Truth Social.

  • PunnyName
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Toss him and ask the idiot blue checks in jail.

  • humblebunEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    5 days ago
    edit-2
    5 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Trumptards took over Clubhouse without the backing from the CEO. It’s a collective strategy, and not one man’s bigotry

    • Omnificer
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 days ago
      edit-2
      5 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      That’s pretty crazy. Do you have examples of Reddit admins directly working with Democrat campaigns or politicians to remove content? I don’t think Hunter Biden’s dick pics count, as revenge porn is already illegal.

      Edit: For anyone confused as to how my reply relates to the above post, the above used to be a claim that Reddit worked with democrats to remove content, but is now edited to say something completely different.

        • Omnificer
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m confused, what Democrat politicians or campaign staff coordinated removing those communities from Reddit? And why would Democrats even need to? Those communities broke sitewide rules egregiously and frequently. Considering how long they were allowed to keep going, it seems more likely (though I’m sure not the actual case) that Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Reddit admins to keep The_Donald open.

    • GhostalmediaEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      The difference is that a community of people is downvoting and upvoting content. It’s not one person controlling what you see.

      • Aurenkin
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Too much nuance for a ‘both sides’ person

    • PunnyName
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      But also one man’s bigotry letting the place become a massive cesspool beyond the cesspool it already was.

    • ImADifferentBirdEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 days ago
      edit-2
      4 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      The first thing Musk did when he took over is un-ban many of those people. He’s since repeatedly banned progressive journalists, added the word “cis” to the hate speech filters, and made numerous other changes to the way the site operates to boost those voices and suppress opposing ones.

      He’s not the only one to blame, to be sure, but if you think he hasn’t been spearheading the effort, you haven’t been paying attention. He’s been backing them and a whole lot more.

      • humblebunEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Fuck Musk, but he doesn’t deserve all the attention he’s given.

        • ImADifferentBirdEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          I mean, no, he doesn’t, but he was getting that attention long before he became openly fascist. And that makes him a huge problem now that he is.