Who says a comic from 1918 can’t be funny?

  • Dasus
    640·
    2 days ago

    This was very topical at the time.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater

    The utterance of “fire!” in and of itself is not generally illegal within the United States: “sometimes you could yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater without facing punishment. The theater may actually be on fire. Or you may reasonably believe that the theater is on fire”.[3] Furthermore, within the doctrine of first amendment protected free speech within the United States, yelling “fire!” as speech is not itself the legally problematic event, but rather, “there are scenarios in which intentionally lying about a fire in a crowded theater and causing a stampede might lead to a disorderly conduct citation or similar charge.”

    I think there was probably quite a lot of these pranksters, and a lot of them probably weren’t punished in any way. So at least they get bonked in the head by Everett.

  • Alk
    580·
    2 days ago

    inb4 Everett just killed an entire theater of people

    • quafeinum
      260·
      2 days ago

      I thought The dude mistook fire for burned toast and Everett just k.o.ed a guy having a stroke

    • Flying SquidOP
      110·
      2 days ago2 days ago

      They seem like they’re okay with that.

    • marcos
      100·
      2 days ago

      In a 1918 theater, it probably makes no difference whatsoever.

  • WytchEnglish
    120·
    2 days ago

    "It was just a prank, bro!

  • kersploosh
    30·
    2 days ago2 days ago

    At first I thought the guy in the opening panel was about to throw a terrible pickup line at the woman in the foreground.