• rsuriEnglish
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago
    link
    fedilink

    Is it still fraud if no one falls for it?

    • underiskEnglish
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      People will still fall for it by treating it like a demonstration of what Elon wants to make, and just an early prototype. The abilities these “robots” displayed are on par with technology that has been available for over 20 years. They don’t realize the parts missing, filled in by human intervention, are the most difficult parts to create and literally cannot be done without a major, generational breakthrough in AI.

    • vxx
      cake
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yes

      “Fraud” is any activity that relies on deception in order to achieve a gain. Fraud becomes a crime when it is a “knowing misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment” (Black’s Law Dictionary). In other words, if you lie in order to deprive a person or organization of their money or property, you’re committing fraud.

    • helenslunchEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago
      edit-2
      8 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      You overestimate the general population. And especially “investors”.

      The cult of Elon remains real.

  • ImgonnatrythisEnglish
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago
    link
    fedilink

    Title reads like tall skinny bitches were wearing robot costumes. What they meant to say is that the robots weren’t autonomous.

    • jballsEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      Didn’t they actually have people in robot costumes previously though?

      • underiskEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, it was a guy they had come out on stage and do a dance in a morph suit and a helmet.

    • WalnutLumEnglish
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      Less like surrogates and more like The Muppets

  • YungOnionsEnglish
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago
    edit-2
    17 hours ago
    link
    fedilink

    🎵 Tesla Optimus! Humans in disguise! 🎵

    • witty_usernameEnglish
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      🎶 They look like robots but are actually just guys 🎶

      • UschaanEnglish
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago
        edit-2
        15 hours ago
        link
        fedilink

        🎵 Nerver hungry, never thirsty 🎵

        🎼 Launched within a year - or thirty.

        🫳

        🎤

  • NeoNachtwaechterEnglish
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago
    edit-2
    17 hours ago
    link
    fedilink

    But it was mostly just a show.

    Attendee Robert Scoble posted that he’d learned humans were “remote assisting” the robots

    Serious question: Wasn’t it obvious?

    • helenslunchEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      Some of it was and some of it wasn’t. I think when they initially came out walking, that was probably autonomous. The dancing was autonomous. The only time we saw evidence that they weren’t autonomous was at the end when they were interacting with people at the event.

      Problem is, we don’t know. We know some of it was. Tesla did not state that any of it was remote controlled, which means we basically have to assume that all of it was.

    • ladiciusEnglish
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago
      edit-2
      16 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      There was some hate babbling when that robot taxi company in SanFran published that their autonomous cars were assisted by remote drivers who took over when situations were too complex for the robots.

      I think remote support and steering will be the most reliable and practical way those tasks will be handled for the foreseeable future. How much assistance the cars will need may diminish but I don’t think they will ever be able to work without any human assistance.

      • kameecodingEnglish
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago
        link
        fedilink

        Sure they will, just put then on rails, make them bigger and available to the public, call it Public AI transport or something

        • ikiddEnglish
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago
          link
          fedilink

          Light rAIl transit.

        • PeppycitoEnglish
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago
          link
          fedilink

          Tele-Reliance Artificial Intelligence Network

          • kameecodingEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago
            link
            fedilink

            More like No Remote only Railiance AI Robo Taxi Network

            • PeppycitoEnglish
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 hours ago
              link
              fedilink

              N.R.O.R.A.I.R.T.N.? I think you missed the joke.

        • MysticKetchupEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago
          link
          fedilink

          I think you’re cooking here, maybe you can get a government grant to fund this

      • umbrellaEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago
        link
        fedilink

        thats just regular driving with extra steps

        • JrockwarEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago
          link
          fedilink

          Sort of. It just depends on how much the person needs to control the vehicle.

          The easiest example I can think of: Imagine lorries traveling along a motorway, and they can do that autonomously because it’s “easy”, and when they get into a city a remote operator needs to drive them manually into the depot.

          Each operator could easily drive 4 or 5 lorries, if only one of those is entering a city at a time. Instead of needing a driver per truck, you only need drivers for the maximum number of trucks that might be entering cities at the same time. For a fleet of 30, that could be 5 drivers.

          For things like mining, where safety regulations mean that you want to avoid having people in the mine as much as possible, even having one driver for every haul truck (so yeah, regular driving with extra steps) could be economically profitable if it means you can reduce some other, potentially expensive safety controls.

  • rickdgEnglish
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago
    link
    fedilink

    The cars were probably also being nudged just in case.

    • Num10ckEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      like a shepherd he said, you can run 10 or 20 of the cars.