• TornadoRexEnglish
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    T-Mobile owned companies and data breaches. Can you name a better duo?

    • Chozo
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I feel like Target has to be giving T-Mobile a run for their money in this field. It seems like I’m reading about a new Target data breach at least every other year.

      • GladiusBEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Vampires and not Twilight?

    • atmurEnglish
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Also probably password hashes.

      The company did not make it clear from this statement if hashed passwords were accessed by the attacker.

      I don’t expect good news if they chose not to share that detail.

      • Chozo
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m pretty sure they’re required to disclose that, and since they’re already publicly admitting to some breaches, I doubt they’d be trying to hide parts of it while they’re already likely being looked into.

        It sounds like the data that was gathered is the sort of data that a customer support rep should have access to. They typically can only see pertinent details like what is necessary to verify a customer’s identity and their device details, which lines up with what was mentioned in the disclosure. I imagine some CSR probably got their work account phished or something.

        Passwords are probably just fine, from the looks of things.

        • wreckedcarzzEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          laughs in 100+ char random unique passwords and hacker teard

      • Billy_GnosisEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        All that the email I received from them said was that they fixed the problem and there was nothing further I needed to do.

      • JJROKCZEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        They are required to disclose if that happened or they believe it happened. If they’re not saying it happened then they believe the password are fine at the time of announcement

  • RaiderkevEnglish
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Fuckin great. I ran out of hotspot like a month ago while working remotely on a road trip. I needed hotspot right then /there, and my phone is on a family plan. Increasing my hotspot data meant I had to do it for the whole family plan and pay almost double the amount on the monthly bill. I thought I outsmarted the system by getting a mint mobile 3 month subscription for like $40 to just use for that trip Aaaaaand my data’s been breached Cool

    • GhostMatterEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The screenshot in the article said the reach was a few months old, last July.

  • atmurEnglish
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I jumped ship to another carrier right after they were bought out by T-Mobile and I’ve dodged price hikes and now data breaches. T-Mobile just ruins everything they touch.

    • essteeyouEnglish
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Price hikes? I just renewed for $250 for a year. I don’t remember the exact price I paid the year before, but $250 is still incredibly cheap compared to most, isn’t it?

      • criticonEnglish
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        My wife has been with Mint for 5 years now and there have not been any increases to her plan, on the contrary, they increased the data allowance in her tier

        • henfredemarsEnglish
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The numbers is the entire reason I remain with Mint. I liked Mint. T-mobile isn’t a company I’d like to do business with and will switch away the moment I see an increase if there’s a better offer elsewhere.

        • Jayb151English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ve been with them for something like 7 years now. Started with 1gb of data, and now I get 4gb. I’ve never changed price tier as well. Over all really great service, bummer about the breach though.

      • atmurEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Hmm, I think I might be mistaken on that then. I remember them announcing that they were nixing the $15 plan (which a couple of my family members were on), but it’s still there. Maybe they reverted it, or it was just Reddit spreading nonsense information. I’ll edit my comment.

      • wreckedcarzzEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Eh, I have my folks on t-mo’s $15/each for 3.5gb/unl/unl plan. My second line is with tello for $6/mo. $25/mo is cheap compared to my at&t business postpaid plan (phone + laptop + watch for ~$130 out the door), but if I wasn’t going for features, I’d be right there with them for the $15 plan. I’d even go both lines from tello, but the difference between tmo qci6 and qci7 is brutal in my area, and often means data becomes completely unusable during the day. Over-subscribed towers. So t-mo MVNOs are a nogo for me, thus $15.

    • twhiteEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Jumped to where if you don’t mind my asking?

      • atmurEnglish
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Tello. The service and price have been basically the same as pre-acquisition Mint. They also use T-Mobile’s network but are not owned by them (for now, at least.)

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I wasn’t aware of their existence. Thank you. I see they’re slightly less expensive than tmo’s mint and don’t require bulk buys, so that’s nice.

        • wreckedcarzzEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Tello (and all* [except Google Fi’s flex plan, and their most expensive plan] tmo MVNOs) run at qci7, or one peg below tmo direct customers* (except tmo essentials and those who go over their ‘high speed data cap’, which are at qci9 or ‘the back of the bus’). This can mean virtually nothing in some areas, or it can mean that the tower you are on is so over subscribed/at capacity so hard that data becomes non-existant.

          I have tello as a second line, where data isn’t important. But my home area falls under the ‘data is non-existant’ category during the day, which is why they are my second line.

          Just be cautious.

          • RolderEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            These kinds of plans work great for when you are on Wi-Fi 99% of the time and you just need it for the 1%.

    • pi3r8English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What makes you so sure they didn’t retain your data?

      • atmurEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There’s chance they did, but I didn’t get any kind of announcement email about it. I also used an email alias for my old Mint account, so if I suddenly start getting spam emails to that address, I’ll have my answer, lol

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    When the merger was first announced, my friend sent me a link to the Ryan Reynolds video of the announcement. I sent back, “cute vid. I sense a breach in our future lol”

    I guess that ‘lol’ wasn’t necessary

    • postmateDumbassEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I guess that ‘lol’ wasn’t necessary

      Everyone deals with pain differently

    • Taztrophe
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Not sure when they added it but immediately after seeing this post I hit my account to change my password and confirmed Mint does offer 2FA using auth apps (I used Google Authenticator) so I activated it.

      I expect this to replace the SMS codes they’d been sending me before and hopefully prevent what you’re describing.

      Would be nice if these big firms would stop serving us the breach du jour.

  • 0110010001100010English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Is it just me or has 2023 been the year of the data breach? Maybe they are just larger or more widely reported. Just seems like there have been a fuck-ton of them this past year.

    • CaptainSpacemanEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Hackers-for-hire on the darkweb is big business these days

      • 0110010001100010English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        While true, I’m not convinced that fully explains it. Having been in IT nearly 2 decades I feel like the second piece is cybersecurity budgets getting slashed. A lot of them have been super-basic shit like someone clicking on a malicious link.

        • PaupersSerenadeEnglish
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah, some youtube videos that cover basics and hiring a firm after a breech is pretty standard it feels.

        • CaptainSpacemanEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Oh for sure, didnt mean to imply it was the only reason.

          Spearphishing high-value targets, or even just phishing a company’s email roster are very very common practices because they yield significant results.

          Theres also the “insurance approach” to cybersecurity, where its cheaper to run PR for a little while and/or take out insurance policies against cyber attacks such as ransomware. The latter is a key factor as to why many companies dont mind paying the ransom at all.

    • sbvEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I bet 2024 will have more. More stuff is online and we don’t seem to be getting any better at securing it.

      • 0110010001100010English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I don’t think the problem is “we” securing things (we being cybersecurity professionals). I think the problem is companies seeing that it’s cheaper to take the PR hit, pay the ransom, pay for cybersecurity insurance, etc than it is to pay for a properly secured network.

        Cybersecurity is hard (citation needed) and costs a lot of money (citation needed). If a company figures it’s cheaper to have a breach and deal with the fallout than it is to properly secure shit I can promise you what will happen.

        As always, follow the $$$.

    • BoofStrokeEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Profit > Security. These companies don’t care so long as the consequences don’t affect profit significantly enough. Infosec is always an afterthought, if considered at all.

      • random65837English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, you’ve clearly never worked for a company that’s dealt with a customer info data breach. It costs them massive amounts of money to clean them up, pay for identity protection (never take that) and the PR alone costs them more in the end.

  • RandomVideosEnglish
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The mint for desktop is much better than the mint for mobile

  • glacierEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I switched to US Mobile a couple months ago and it has been a much better experience.

    • QuarterSwedeEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Hadn’t heard of them. Too bad their plans are complicated.

  • martinbEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I thought they meant Linux Mint, the Debian derivative. Very confused until I read the comments perhaps I should read the article 😳

  • Ahri BoyEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Shit. My American Aunt and her family uses T-Mobile Family Plan.

    • random65837English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      TMO is breached yearly, Mint customers and TMO customers aren’t the same thing, Mint is TMO’s customer, not the individuals. Not the same databases. In the end, Mint doesn’t have half the data on it’s customers that actual TMO does on theirs.

  • ExtrasEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Fuck but I do have totp already enabled should I just change my password?

    Edit: my paranoia got to me I’m gonna just reset my totp seeds and change my password. Some of the info was fake so that’ll protect me a bit. Guess that’s the best you can do for now

    Edit 2: they made it a pain in the ass to change your password apparently now they favor only 20 characters max (rip my 35 character password). A nice warning on their website would’ve been really helpful

    • Unaware7013
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Edit 2: they made it a pain in the ass to change your password apparently now they favor only 20 characters max (rip my 35 character password).

      That just screams they’re not storing passwords properly. If you’re salt+hashing your passwords, they could throw Hamlet into the password field and the only limit is how big the text entry field can be. The output is a fixed length string, so I put length should be immaterial.

  • DudewitbowEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I got off mint last month so at the very least they cant port my number off when the number is no longer with them anymore.

  • time_lordEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If I never got the email, does that mean I wasn’t effected?