Bill would prohibit teenagers from creating an account, and is now headed to the state’s Republican-controlled senate

Florida lawmakers advanced a bill on Wednesday that would prohibit social media platforms from allowing young teens to have an account while requiring everyone else to verify their age.

The measure prohibits anyone under 16 from creating a new social media account and requires platforms to delete existing accounts held by minors who are younger than 16. It also would require social media companies to delete any personal information from the accounts and for the platforms to use a “nongovernmental, independent, third-party not affiliated with the social media platform” to verify users’ age.

The bill passed the Florida house with a bipartisan 106-13 vote and now heads to the Republican-controlled senate.

  • dhorkEnglish
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It also would require social media platforms to use a “nongovernmental, independent, third-party not affiliated with the social media platform” to verify users’ age.

    Quick, let’s go check which State Legislators own shares in third-party age verification firms

    • PhlubbaDubba
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’d be shocked if there were such a firm without any official API from the states or feds to provide that verification

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It just sounds like they don’t want kids to be able to talk to each other about how fucked their state and their educational system is becoming.

    • cm0002
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      That’s exactly it, pre Internet it was easy for them to keep small town kids indoctrinated as a conservative because they could thoroughly control the flow of information

      Post Internet it’s simply not feasible without crazy ass laws like this, the second a kid gets online/on social media they see right through the conservative bullshit. It’s not 100% ofc, but the majority yes and they’re seeing it play out with gen z right now and that’s what they’re scared of

      • IninewCrowEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        And what better way to promote information that you don’t want shared then to ban it.

        We were all teenagers once and we all know, once you ban something, it’s like sharks tasting blood in the ocean, it’s a signal to tell young people to go get it find it and use it just to piss off authority.

        These laws won’t prohibit young people it will encourage them to use social media.

        • cm0002
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          You’d think theyd have learned from the federal governments original Child Internet Protection law when every child suddenly turned 18+ lmao

  • sygniusEnglish
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They’re not wrong about the addiction to dopamine hits. However, this is such a big waste of time and money on such a poor way to handle this.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      And ultimately it won’t stop them and in fact put the kids in more danger because they’ll actively be hiding their internet activity from people who could help them

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It also doesn’t do anything to actually address those dopamine hits.

  • Flying Squid
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It also would require social media companies to delete any personal information from the accounts and for the platforms to use a “nongovernmental, independent, third-party not affiliated with the social media platform” to verify users’ age.

    How to get every Florida adult’s identity stolen through a data leak.

  • Uranium3006
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    this isn’t to “protect children” and you should know better by now. it’s a censorship bill because they want to keep kids ignorant and brainwashed. we should all oppose this

  • FuglyDuckEnglish
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m curious how they plan to enforce it?

    VPN, create account. Boom. Yer in.

    All they’re doing is teaching kids to go around adults, and evade “authorities”, etc.

  • oxjoxEnglish
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It’s so weird how the party of family values and limited government consistently aim to impose restrictions on parents.

    I’m not opposed to kids being restricted from social media (I might go as far as fully supporting it), but that’s the job of the parent, not Florida.

    “These dopamine hits [from social media] are so addictive, it’s like a digital fentanyl, Fiona McFarland, a Republican state lawmaker who cosponsored the legislation, said on the house floor on Wednesday, according to Politico. “And even the most plugged-in parent or attuned teen has a hard time shutting the door against these addictive features.

    You said it yourself kids AND parents are both susceptible to the addiction. Are you going to ban social media for adults, legislators, grandmas? Trump lives in Florida. Please, can you ban him too??

    • NoIWontPickaName
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Your logic doesn’t hold up, we already restrict some addictive things only to adults, the big two being nicotine and alcohol

  • theywilleatthestars
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Wonder how many queer kids will be deprived of the only community they have because of this

    • dezmdMEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Lemmy active user increase.

      This is certainly a startegem from power brokers trying to destroy the freedom and open communication the internet ushered in over the last 30 years. Its all about controlling the spread of information to limit exposure of corruption that protects and builds the long term shadow wealth.

      Now Im sounding like a different side of the same coin of early 00s libertairan twat conspiracy fuckers.

  • mrbubblesort
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    How they think this is gonna go: “Haha, now that we got all those youngins off the ticktoks they have to listen to us and believe what we tell them”

    How it’s really gonna go: JUNIOR GET THE FUCK IN HERE! I need to see the new Trump meme from aunt Karen, why the hell does my facebook have ‘blocked in the state of Florida’ all over it? What’d you do to it?

    • SeaJ
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Basically pushing them towards Rumble and Truth Social.

  • Cyborganism
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Hahahaha the internet has practically become like, 4 websites. Three of which are social media platforms. What the fuck are they supposed to do?

    • nicetriangle
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Ideally, touch grass.

      Law’s never gonna work tho. What are they gonna do? Start IDing social media users? I bet all the conspiracy theory wackjob MAGA Qanon types down there will just love that.

  • dan1101
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If the kids can lie about their age they will just lie about their age.

  • Froyn
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So “plausible deniability for groomers” ?