• SymphonicResonanceEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I actually didn’t care when there was an ad in the beginning of the video or what not. It was when I had to start watching multiple ads in the middle of a 10 minute video as well. Like come on, not even broadcast TV is that annoying.

    • TheHarpyEagleEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Shorts are such a stupidly blatant way to start showing more ads than content, and they make navigating channels impossible. Hell you can’t even get away from ads in search results with premium.

      • Dark ArcEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Shorts are just a TikTok clone

  • AcidOctopusEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Two days ago I noticed when watching through the app on my phone that I could no longer just skip ads, and the trick of reporting them to skip didn’t work anymore either. I effectively had to just sit and wait.

    That same day I got NewPipe, imported my subscriptions, and honestly even if this is just a phased trial or something, I won’t be going back to the standard YT app.

    Creators make pennies from ad revenue. If I want to support them, I’ll make a donation or subscribe to their Patreon or something.

    I won’t just sit and suffer a slew of ads while my data is harvested under the false pretense that it’s all to support the creators.

    • AuxEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      The problem is that YouTube infrastructure is ridiculously expensive. Streaming 4K videos is not a joke. Creators won’t create crap without YouTube. Sadly all other platforms have died. Again, because running such service is ridicolously expensive.

      • ArmokGoBEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        They’d still be trying to pull this shit if all streaming was limited to 144p.

  • wheeldawgEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen the word “allowlisted”. Did someone forget “whitelisted” is a thing, or is that term finally cancelled?

    • tlebEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Whitelist and blacklist were indeed cancelled despite having no racial origin.

      • tonarinokanasanEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        There are cultural traditions of using colors as symbols, many of which are harmless – red for anger, blue for sadness, green for envy. Whitelist and blacklist come from the very long-standing theme of using white to represent good and black to represent evil.

        Regardless of how you feel about the origin of those themes, it makes sense to start moving away from them now. Whether intentional or not, they can be harmful and aren’t really necessary.

        • kameecodingEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          not only that but whitelist-blacklist are just bad names.

          even greenlist-redlist would be better (at least while we have light signals at intersections) as green means go red means stop are more universally understood.

          but allowlist and blocklist are just plain better, they are self explanatory words. you don’t need to learn what they mean since it’s right there in the name.

          whitelist-blacklist are names where you need to learn the meaning of them, sticking to them just because they were used in the past is not the best argument.

          • Hello HotelEnglish
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Words often work like unique signifiers “symbols”, often by using them you learn them and dont question it. Thats a neutral phenomenon. It has advantages and disadvantages. Mainly, redlist is as disconnected from meaning as much as blacklist is. Requiring the understanding of what a “car” is, and why they cant “wheel their way” thru a cross shaped road becuse of a colored light being there. (Mabe even “across” may make no sense anymore in the future) It sounds really stupid when put like that, but accessability is important.

            • kameecodingEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              it isn’t though. you don’t need cars to learn red means stop, we literally had miniature roads, crossing and signs at my pre-school (or whatever it’s called in English, the one you go at age 3 till 6, you start school at 6).

              Stop sign is red, pedestrian crossing are just red - stop, green - go. you learn that from a very young age so the association is natural.

              Also, just to be clear, I didn’t say redlist is good, just that it’s less stupid than blacklist.