Another chance for the Brits to get rid of this weird institution.

  • belated_frog_pants
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Let him be the last and turn their houses into museums with the money going to the countries they demolished

    • jarfil
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Heh, that’s a good one. They are planning to send something to those countries already, but it’s immigrants.

      Anyway, at this point some say the British royals are a net benefit for the country as a tourist attraction. Paris has Disneyland, London has Buckingham 🤷

      • Pigeon
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        They do have a lot more soft power over the government than many give them credit for though, plus some (so far) unused actual power that they only don’t use by tradition (which these days is more clearly a bad idea to rely on than ever). Plus all there’s all that money that goes into the pageantry of it (royal weddings, etc).

        I feel like it’s be one thing to let them keep their royal titles, but they shouldn’t be enmeshed with the state in any actual way imo.

        • jarfil
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I don’t know how much power the British royalty actually have, but probably more than other royal families since the British monarch is also the head of the Anglican church. That not only has them enmeshed with the state, but also breaks church-state separation. 🤷

          The pageantry, is what drives the souvenir market: for every birth, coming of age, marriage, coronation, random events, then death and rinse and repeat, there is a ton of souvenirs getting sold, commemorative coins, random mementos, etc.

          Like, right now, Sotheby’s is auctioning the set props from the series The Royals. Not even the actual things, just the props, and they start “cheap” at only 800-1000£ the cheapest. Sure they’re supposed to donate any benefits to charity, but then the series itself was only so successful because of the pageantry.

          Turns out the state collects taxes on all of that, so the money spent on monarchs, is more like an actor’s salary. They also get other sources of income, like donations from businesses to act as international representatives, profits from the businesses they own themselves, or bribes presents from foreign representatives for their mediation in trade negotiations.

      • Laconic
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        French palaces make money without supporting the austentacious lifestyle of monarcht.

        • jarfil
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The “ostentatious lifestyle” is what drives the souvenir market.

          You go to Buckingham, and can buy all sorts of random junk with a photo of the monarchs, royal symbols, and whatnot. They’re even collectible!

          Last time I was at Versalles, they were selling hat umbrellas. Like, seriously? Come on, at least sell some toy guillotines with a series of monarchs with detachable heads, or something but that seems to be too grim for the general public, so hat umbrellas. 🙄

  • pbjammEnglish
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Will he turn to Homeopathy or one of the other crank medical remedies he has promoted in the past?

    • SplicedBrainwrapEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      edit-2
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I bet he’ll do everything but credit only the homeopathy/alt treatments

  • Rev3rze
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    My biggest takeaway from the article is that he’s 75. Holy shit, I would’ve guessed 86.

    • JeenaOP
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah, I thought this was a typo first.

    • intrepid
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I don’t like the monarchy either. But I assume you haven’t seen anyone suffer from cancer. If you did, it’s a misery you won’t wish on your worst enemies.

      • KhruxEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Charles has literally lobbied ministers to change spending plans to go against the NHS in favour of homeopathic remedies. People have likely died from cancer directly due to his decisions and in my opinion, lol is a suitable response to that karma.

  • AutoTL;DRBEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The type of cancer has not been revealed, but the palace said the King began “regular treatments” on Monday.

    The King informed both his sons personally about his diagnosis and Prince William was said to be in regular contact with his father.

    Prince Harry, who lives in the United States, spoke to his father and will be travelling to the UK to see him in the coming days.

    The King, 75, returned to London from Sandringham in Norfolk on Monday morning and the palace says he has commenced treatment as an outpatient.

    Although he will pause his public events, the King will continue with his constitutional role as head of state, including paperwork and private meetings.

    Prince William had also temporarily withdrawn from public engagements while he helped his wife Catherine, the Princess of Wales, as she recovered from “abdominal surgery”.


    Saved 69% of original text.