OpenAI boss Sam Altman wants $7tn. For all our sakes, pray he doesn’t get it::The man behind ChatGPT is wooing the UAE to invest in energy-hungry AI. But if it turns out his tech can’t fix the world, he’s got his escape plan

  • WytchEnglish
    arrow-up
    216
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Tech billionaires trying to solve the world’s problems is a bit like a cancer trying to save its host from organ failure

    • iAvicennaEnglish
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      they are not trying to solve anything really, they just think they are the next best thing earth has ever seen so they have the right to do everything

      • OrbituaryEnglish
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m working with a douchebag billionaire directly right now on a complex project related to the ransomware encryption of a healthcare provider. Because he’s part of the private equity firm and a billionaire, he thinks he knows how to drive the resolution better than I and my team of techs do.

        All he does is drag me into more meetings and force me to get my techs to do shit that’s not conducive to restoring their systems.

        He’s a giant waste of self aggrandized trash.

      • OrbituaryEnglish
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You’re playing checkers, not chess.

        • QuaternionsRockEnglish
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago
          edit-2
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m not 100% sure what you mean by that, but I’m trying to say that, if Altman is a problem due to his wealth, then the bar to becoming a problem is substantially lower than a billion dollars.

          • RaiEnglish
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            8 months ago
            edit-2
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            That poster is not implying he’s a tech billionaire, he’s saying tech billionaires are jerking themselves off to throw money at AI because it’s good for business.

  • GnuLinuxDudeEnglish
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Wake me up when “ai” makes the amount of CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere trend downward. Generative AI is just a way to burn electricity to take value produced by humans and then replace those same humans, all to line the pockets of the companies that can afford to churn all the data in the world.

    For the handful of genuinely cool and interesting things it can do, the number of extremely awful costs and externalities is like 1000x worse.

  • rageagainstmachinesEnglish
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Serious question: why does everyone in silicon valley have a god complex?

    • rottingleafEnglish
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I think it’s Steve Jobs’ popularity and following, where his own god complex was an important trait. Then some people realized that if you imitate it, you get more money and publicity, and normies will believe you more. Then, of course, with power it’s not hard to really develop one.

  • LeroyJenkinsEnglish
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m glad perspectives has stopped treating Sam Altman like a tech God. dude is second coming of every FAANG CEO and Elon combined. there’s no way that guy isnt up to no good.

    • laurelravenEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The more I’m hearing, the more it sounds like the former board was justified in axing him

      • Echo DotEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The problem is they went about it in a profoundly stupid way. The way they acted made it seem like he done something explicit and then they refused to actually elaborate. We still don’t know what really happened.

      • raspberriesareyummyEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        oh they absolutely were. just how that shitshow went down with the M$ offers and the decision reversal showed that it was power politics in play to kill reason

  • AshMan85English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Socialism for monopolies but not for starving and sick people.

  • kingthrillgoreEnglish
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Before he was a thundering asshat at Y Combinator, he started a mobile company that sold your location to brands called Loopt. He’s a piece of work.

    • JackcooperEnglish
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I am thinking of getting a tomtom. Tired of my phone trying to throw a fit when I disable location after I’ve figured out my way to my destination.

      So much of this advertising economy depends on it and we just give it away.

      • evranchEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Just learn how to navigate properly with a map. You know where you are (hopefully) and you look up where you’re going. Do your own routing, it’s not hard and once you’ve been doing it for awhile you’ll have instinctive routes you use to link different areas. No location permissions required.

        If you use navigation all the time you can become like my ex-wife. Lost without it, in her own city. Exercise your brain by finding your way around with landmarks and signage, I have never used navigation apps because I know my way across three provinces, and can navigate the major cities just based on my instinctive mental maps of them.

        Edit: I don’t mean a paper map. But being able to use your phone’s map software to find a route without it dictating every turn to you is a valuable skill that is apparently getting lost. What are you going to do if your phone dies, will you be able to go anywhere?

        • linearchaosEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m not about to downvote you, but, I seriously don’t miss paper maps.

          Every time there’s a new neighborhood somewhere you have no freaking clue where a road is because you need to go out and buy the latest paper map.

          I’ll just use open street map thanks.

          • evranchEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I’m not talking about paper maps, I use Google maps myself. I do like the feel of a paper map but they aren’t practical anymore for the reasons you mentioned.

            I even search for my destination and look at where I’m going.

            However I don’t use the navigation feature. Never seen the need. If I can’t find my way around the city without an AI holding my hand, I’ve got dementia.

        • 🐍🩶🐢English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          edit-2
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I miss the giant almanacs the car insurance company would give you each year that had all of the US states in them. We would plot routes for cross country trips. I can use a paper or digital map, but I do like using something like Google Maps to see traffic, construction, and accidents when I travel. I use it at home when going into certain areas as I have no idea what state the current construction disaster is that day compared to a few days ago.

          Otherwise, I find it important to learn how to navigate cities without maps. When I moved, I used to drive around the city in random directions to see how it looked, what the street names were, and get a sense of the layout. If things started to look like gang territory, or super shady, I would just turn around.

        • davysnavyEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          “exercise your brain” lol. Another way to look at it is using precious brain power that could be used on other things. Also, it’s cringe to take pride in being able to navigate without a map. It’s useless knowledge in most cases. We all have phones.

          • le_saucisson_masquayEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Until you don’t. Battery dies. Phone get stolen. During an emergency if you struggle to navigate that’s embarrassing.

          • evranchEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Other things like what, driving the car? Chatting with your passengers? Orienting your cheeseburger properly? Hopefully you can handle all of these at once and still not miss your turn.

            Are you so inept in your life that you need your phone to tell you where you’re going?

            Where I live the roads have no names and the cell coverage is marginal. Some roads are flooded, some covered with snowdrifts Some haven’t been passable for years. I don’t know a single person who uses the navigation features of their smartphone.

      • SteakEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Don’t get a tom tom. Learn to use real paper maps. I use google maps most of the time because its fast and works. But anytime I’m out in the bush I have gps turned off I use maps I’ve bought or ones I’ve made. Learning to read and understand maps has made a big difference in my life.

  • zarkanianEnglish
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I have no patience for things I’m not interested in: parties, most people. When someone examines a photo and says, ‘Oh, he’s feeling this and this and this,’ all these subtle emotions, I look on with alien intrigue.

    Is he describing sociopathy?

    • trololololEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Just confirming he has what it takes to be CEO. I wonder if there are other skills or that’s it.

    • ilinamoratoEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Definitely the guy we want running the company that decides what the human race needs from computers, then.

    • raspberriesareyummyEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Is that “it” talking about itself? Then don’t let it bullshit you, it’s trying to communicate, but by being manipulative. So ignore it.

  • SketchySeaBeastEnglish
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If he wants $7tn, he better pay for all the content he stole to do it. Fuck these guys, wanting to become unfathomably rich off other people’s labour.

  • raspberriesareyummyEnglish
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This is a face born to be punched. Much like the Zuckfuck or the Muskrat.

  • OptionalEnglish
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They should use that non-creepy picture of him.

    Hm? Oh. Oh right.

  • Digital_manEnglish
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    A “product” of any kind will not solve our problems.

    • iopqEnglish
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago
      edit-2
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      A phone is a product, and it solves a lot of problems.

      I used to print out mapquest directions to wherever I drove. Now I can just use navigation so I seldom miss turns on dark streets anymore.

      Products can solve problems, that’s why people pay for them

      • HaagelEnglish
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I think they mean existential problems, like our belligerent lumbering towards the violent self-destruction of humanity.

        • Digital_manEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          This is exactly what I meant.

          A product is something created by an organization ( in our case corporations) to make money. Period.

          The fact it can make our lives easier is a secondary side effect. The way these products are made can ( and usually do) exacerbate our problems.

          Solutions ? Nah.

  • fidodoEnglish
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The US collects about 5 trillion in revenue a year. This fucker wants a budget on the scale of the biggest revenue of a country on earth. That’s more power than the president has. Fuck this guy. Nobody deserves that much trust.

  • BigMacHoleEnglish
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m GLAD we don’t Tax him OR his TRILLION dollar company!

  • MastengweEnglish
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    All AI needs to be shut the fuck down until it can be properly regulated. Making up the rules as we go is just fucking stupid.

    • KairuByteEnglish
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Who are you expecting to regulate it? How are you envisioning those regulations working? Who and how is that getting enforced?

      It’s like trying to regulate 3D printing. Sure, you can probably find some agency that can pretend to be in charge, but unless they have monitoring software installed on every 3D printer including consumer and DIY units, they aren’t going to know what anyone does in their basement.

    • theredknightEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Lol by who? Octogenarian Congress members who get more bribes than emails?

      • Echo DotEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Bribes are the only way to get their attention since they don’t read their emails

    • Echo DotEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’ll be shut down for decades then. Governments around the world are dynamically doing bugger all about it.

      • MastengweEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’d be fine with that. As long as it’s contained.

    • phoenixzEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Problem there is that we don’t really don’t know what rules we need until we mind of have it. Governments do need to be much faster with making these rules when they appear needed, though, and AI companies should require a LOT more government supervision.