My eye’s not twitching. Your eye is twitching.

  • MagnetarEnglish
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    And it did it’s job, didn’t it? Are they arranged or not?

  • charlesEnglish
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m with you, but is it possible this helps in some way with nozzle movement that might not be easily visible? Just trying to figure out why it would even consider this placement.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️OPEnglish
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If I reduce the count one it will arrange them in a neat grid, albeit with one row shorter than the other. And there is an element of randomness, if you click the arrange button again it will sometimes place the outlier on the other side.

      I have no idea what the fuck its thought process is.

      • faebudoEnglish
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Make the movements visible in preview. Most probably it makes the total movement shorter when switching between parts.

      • atzanteolEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There may be multiple solutions to the fitness algorithm it’s applying. So you may sometimes see one and sometimes the other depending on some “random” variable.

    • liquefy4931English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You have the right idea! The slicer takes all printhead movements into account and likely shaves off a fraction of the total print time by positioning one object like this.

  • LuciEnglish
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Do not question the auto arranger if you know whats best for you

  • SynapseEnglish
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Ah Perfectly arranged, as all things should be 😘🤌🫴

  • GrassEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yeah it drives me a bit insane too. I often end up just manually placing everything. I wish it had a mode where you roughly place things and it spaces them consistently without significantly changing their relative positions

    • ShepherdPieEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Cura is guilty of this last part too. It’ll flip parts around however it sees fit, which isn’t ideal because then you get z-seams in all different areas, so matching parts no longer match.

  • LazaroFilmEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I think it tries to keep things as close to the center of the bed to minimize travel.

  • kent_ehEnglish
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They all printed ok with no interference between the parts. All parts are perfectly usable when they are removed from the print bed.

    Why does it matter that they’re not in perfectly straight rows and columns?

  • voxelEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    does it matter though? in the end, they all fit and have reasonable distance from each other

    • VoyajerEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It can, but it will depend on the material. I’ve had much better luck with warping by packing multiple models tightly together when printing in ASA.

  • DkarmaEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Lol rookie. Add the 12th delete the 1st.

  • rugburnEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Bambu studio (shameless rip off of Prusaslicer) does the exact same thing and I hate it

    • GreyBeardEnglish
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I wouldn’t call it a shameless ripoff, it’s a fork. Which Prusaslicer was as well. I’m actually glad they did that rather than making yet another closed source slicer. That means that enhancements that Bambu puts in can very likely be ported over to Prusaslicer, and vice versa. It’s a win for everybody.

      • TwanHEEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Which then gave us orcaslicer (fork of bambu) which has been a godsent for having my mainsail UI in the slicer itself.

  • nikschaEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Please note that the traveling salesman problem is NP hard, so the auto-arrange algorithm will never aim for a “perfect”/ fastest arrangement. It just ensures that the parts have a minimum distance to each other while keeping them as close as possible to the center of the build plate

  • rambosEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Nesting is nasty 🙃