• A_A
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    “The Union Density Rate” ()

    How could the average Joe even start to guess what this could ever mean ?

    • Ranvier
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah, weird way to describe it. Why not just say percentage of workers in a union?

      • A_A
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Exactly ! (and thanks for its meaning).
        The funniest part is the title also says : “You Read That Right” well, no ! I didn’t since it was unreadable for me :-O

      • FlowVoidEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because “union density” is shorter. Just as GDP is shorter than “sum of the income of everyone in a country”.

        • surewhynotlem
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          SINBIPDU

          (shorter is not better if people don’t understand)

          • FlowVoidEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s jargon, like OOP and VRAM. The people who tend to refer to it will understand.

        • Ranvier
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          edit-2
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I get the term after reading the article, I’ve just never heard it described that way before. Their own figures say union membership rates in the article which seems much clearer to me and has the same number of words as “union density rate. Density seems to imply something more geographic or spatial, just seems like an odd way to describe it.

          • FlowVoidEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s an econ term, it doesn’t have to make sense to non-economists!

            For instance you would think the unemployment rate is the percentage of the population without employment, but no.

        • MagicShel
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Just as GDP is shorter than “sum of the income of everyone in a country” “who’s winning at capitalism”.

          • FlowVoidEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Winning is a matter of perspective. There are plenty of people of who would not want to move to a country with higher GDP.

    • Lmaydev
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago
      edit-2
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s also just their opinion. The results aren’t out yet.

    • alabasterhotdog
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If only that average Joe had access to some type of information network on which to look it up, if only. But alas