From the article:

Scientists have caught a once-in-a-billion-years evolutionary event in progress, as two lifeforms have merged into one organism that boasts abilities its peers would envy. Last time this happened (1.6 billion years ago), certain advanced cells absorbed a type of bacteria that could harvest energy from sunlight. These became organelles called chloroplasts, which gave sunlight-harvesting abilities, as well as a fetching green color, to a group of lifeforms you might have heard of – plants.

And now, scientists have discovered that it’s happening again. A species of algae called Braarudosphaera bigelowii was found to have engulfed a cyanobacterium that lets them do something that algae, and plants in general, can’t normally do – “fixing” nitrogen straight from the air, and combining it with other elements to create more useful compounds.

  • Jimbabwe
    arrow-up
    229
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Born too late to explore the world. Born too soon to explore the stars. Born just in time for Algae 2.0 to drop.

    • Victor
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      And what a feature drop it was. Right? Or was it? Not sure what “fixing” nitrogen is helpful for

      • fireweed
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        As any farmer or gardener will tell you, nitrogen is critical for plant growth, and for most plants it’s obtained via the soil. Soil nitrogen can be depleted if not replenished (in an agricultural context, by compost or fertilizer), but there’s plentiful nitrogen in the atmosphere (which is mostly nitrogen, actually) so any plant that has nitrogen fixing abilities has constant access to this critical nutrient. There currently exist nitrogen-fixing plants (peas and clover for example), but they don’t actually do it on their own, they rely on a symbiotic relationship with bacteria.

        • Kowowow
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Ooh could this make for a truly green way to capture carbon and make fertilizer? It would be sweet to have a closed system that grows the algea with solar then you collect it squeze the water out, bury it then start again

        • MonkderDritte
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Soo, it’s not something that doesn’t happen now and then?

          • ExcrubulentEnglish
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            edit-2
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            No, the symbiotic relationship means that the bacteria live in/on the plant, much like we have a gut biome of organisms that are discrete from us, but have symbiosis with us.

            The article is about a bacterium becoming engulfed within an algal cell and slowly becoming an organelle of that cell.

            This process begins as a type of symbiosis, but at the end of it you would no longer call it symbiotic, as it ends as a single organism.

            The breathless yammering about “the last time this happened we got plants” seems a little much though. The last time this happened that we know of was 1.5 billion years ago and we got plants. The fact we’ve caught it in the act right now sounds like this might just be a much more common phenomenon than we thought.

            The article says

            In the 4-billion-odd-year history of life on Earth, primary endosymbiosis is thought to have only happened twice that we know of, and each time was a massive breakthrough for evolution.

            It’s possible the only reason we’re aware of these events is because they were massive breakthroughs. After watching it happen, we may have more information about how to spot other times it has happened.

          • BakerBagel
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            No plants are actually able to break down nitrogen gas. The bacteria that can break it down live in their root systems, not in the plant cells. The root systems are an ecosystem for the bacteria, much loke yoir moith and intestines are for useful bacteria. What this study describes is an algae cell incorporating a nitrogen fixing bacteria into it’s cellular structure, which as far as we can tell has only happened twice in the history of life on earth: when a large bacteria incorporated a smaller one, thus creating eularyotic cells with mitochondria (which was our last common ancestor with plants) and when another eularyotic cell absorbed a photosynthetic bacteria, creating plant chloroplasts.

        • Victor
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          This is interesting, thank you. So I’m guessing we don’t really want wild plants to gain this ability? We really want to control this ability? What would happen if all plants gained this ability – would we have any nitrogen left in the atmosphere? I’m guessing we personally (as a species) need the current mixture of air compounds to be a certain way (the way it is now, pretty much) in order not to be poisoned? I’ve heard about oxygen poisoning – that’s a thing, right?

          Or we might want to have some plants gain this ability in order to do terraforming of another planet which has mainly nitrogen in its atmosphere, very far into the future? Would be cool. Maybe.

          • Hugin
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The N2 in the atmosphere go through a lot of conversions in the bacteria and plant but eventually ends up as nitrates which then break down and release N2 back in the atmosphere.

            So no we won’t end up with no nitrogen in the atmosphere. Generally we want more nitrogen fixed as most crops deplete the nitrogen and only crops that host the nitrogen fixing bacteria can replenish the fixed nitrogen in the soil.

            This is the main reason for crop rotations. Farmers grow corn that depletes the fixed nitrogen and then soy that has bacteria that replenishes it.

            It would be great if corn got that feature as a lot of fossil fuels are used to fix nitrogen for fertilizers. See the Haber process for more info. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process

      • BakerBagel
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nitrogen is crucial for duplicating DNA, which needs to happen for vells to divide. Despite being over 70% of the atmosphere, nitrogen gas is incredibly inert, so most organisms cant use it for any metabolic purposes. There are many bacteria that are able to break down nitrogen gas into useable nitrates, most famously those that live in the root systems of legimes like soy and peanuts, which is why American corn farmers grow so much soy.

    • islesEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The ocean is only marginally explored.

    • SaltySalamander
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Man, it’s easier, and way cheaper, to explore the world today than it ever has been before.

      • lesbian_seagull
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I think explore is meant as discover anew, not just travel to a place.

        • Fedizen
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          edit-2
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I think even at the height of “exploration” there were already people living in the “explored” places.

  • systemglitch
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If they saw this happen, then it happens far more often than once in a billion years.

    • DickFiasco
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The article says it’s been in-progress for the last 100 million years, so “once in a billion years” is really like a 1:10 chance. Gotta get those clicks though.

      • systemglitch
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s fair. I expect there are quite a few examples of this happening in various places we are yet to discover.

        Some thrive, some die out, but it seems to be a normal evolution of life.

  • NounsAndWords
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Very interested to see where this goes over the next several thousands of years.

    • then_three_more
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Very interested to see where this goes over the next several hundreds of thousands of years.

      Ftfy

  • GrabtharsHammer
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So the last time was chloroplasts, right? And that worked out super well for all the other organisms and didn’t do anything catastrophic to the atmosphere, right?

    • Scubus
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Meh, what bad thing could possibly happen if our nitrogen concentration goes down dramatically? I mean that stuff is basically useless /s

  • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    man i can’t wait until 20 years from now when scientists find out that this is actually like, really fucking common or some dumb bullshit like that.

    Or at least i hope that happens, because it would be very funny.

    • Fedizen
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      edit-2
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Its probably very common. I would suspect its happened before and the larger barrier is unicellular to multicellular life.

      • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        i’m guessing the generic is very common, but the specific event here is very rare. Like a unix time party for instance.

    • UnpluggedFridge
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      A similar thing happens with cockroaches where crucial bacteria are absorbed into cells to ensure inheritance in offspring.

      • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        words spoken by someone who has spent 30 years studying the reproductive cycle of the cockroach

        • Meansalladknifehands
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Bacteria 🦠 goes👋 and then brrrr 👉👌👏👏 in cockroach kids 🪳 so they become 1️⃣, hallelujah 🙏

  • aeronmelon
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So what do we get this time? I hope it’s some uncontrollable monster that eats plastic and religious zealots.

    • SlopppyEngineer
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Breathing and using nitrogen directly. I guess that would give some kind of plant that needs less or no soil.

      • Danquebec
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        edit-2
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Legumes fix nitrogen from the air and still need soil.

      • Piemanding
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Sounds like the creature that was destroying all plants in Interstellar.

  • SGGEnglish
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Better keep Captain Janeway away from it. She’ll un-tuvix them so fast it’ll make your head spin

    • then_three_more
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You commit one murder and no one let’s you live it down, meanwhile The Sisko renders a planet uninhabitable to humans and tricks a foreign government into joining your war and no one bats an eye.

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    edit-2
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This isn’t that uncommon, it’s just really hard for it to survive into reproduction. Protists are notorious for it, this one alone has at least three separate bacterial symbiotes and even replaced it’s own mitochondria(which themselves are endosymbiotic bacteria) with another bacteria, essentially reinventing the fucking wheel: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixotricha_paradoxa

  • mlgEnglish
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    When mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell actually happens IRL again

  • nucleativeEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    edit-2
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    As a layman, my interpretation is that scientists have observed a mutation in some prehistoric cells / creatures that is likely positive. In this case an algae and a bacteria somehow combined in such a way that they have become something new and better.

    As an optimistic guesser it seems like this probably happens fairly often and is either unlikely to survive or replicate for long. But, having observed something that we have known about is further evidence that we understand ongoing evolution and may have a better, more sound understanding of how life came to be.

    I guess that’s probably interesting because it helps us better understand what the building blocks for life are, and as we discover them on other planets or in other places in outer space we may better be equipped to understand how or if life exists outside our own world.

  • notfromhere
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I think this means Ents will become a thing now.