• KorkkiEnglish
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Cold war boomers trying to legislate tech they know nothing about

    • higgsbosonEnglish
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      A group of “cold war boomers” also designed the RISC chips in question.

      • wildbus8979English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        RISC-V is pretty recent, the project started in 2010. It’s a lot more likely that it was GenX professors and millenial grad students.

      • bruhduhEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago
        edit-2
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        deleted by creator

  • witty_usernameEnglish
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Lol let’s stop people from using this open source design
    If anything this might increase self-reliance

  • sudokuEnglish
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Doesn’t seem there is anything that they can do lol

    • antonEnglish
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The spec is open source, particular implementation are typically under patent/copyright protection.
      Not that they can be enforced effectively, unless the chips are exported into the US.

      • sudokuEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Isn’t the whole point that china wants to implement it themselves so they would know if it’s secure (i.e. has no western backdoors and has chinese backdoors)?

  • pastermilEnglish
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What are they gonna do next, ban Linux?

  • rc_buggyEnglish
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So the US government wants to curtail the use of an open source architecture that is published by a Swiss organization which isn’t controlled by any government.

    Talk about tilting at windmills. What the fuck could they possibly do? Sanction RISC-V International? ONO!

  • istanbulluEnglish
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The US government is a spoiled child that is throwing a temper tantrum over the success of others.

    • demonswordEnglish
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago
      edit-2
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Nah, it’s a failing empire. And there has never been an empire that fell before on humanity’s history that had a peaceful sunset

      • iopqEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Take a guess, is the US share of world GDP decreasing or increasing over time or roughly staying the same?

        • acockworkorangeEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That’s irrelevant. Is their sphere of influence growing or shrinking?

          • iopqEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            How do you measure that? Because you can make an argument either way

            • acockworkorangeEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Not with numbers. And I’d like to see you argue it’s been growing.

    • MonkderDritteEnglish
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago
      edit-2
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s ruled by spoiled childs, so that checks out.

  • CocodapufEnglish
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    How could this ever even work? Isn’t the cat out of the bag. China will make chips if it wants to I don’t see how you could stop them.

  • HanrahanEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    By make it harder do they mean put a gun to ASMLs head to not sell them the hadware needed to make them ? ASML is a Dutch company, spun out of Phillips from memory.

  • AutoTL;DRBEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The United States Department of Commerce is reportedly considering lawmakers’ calls to make it harder for China to use the RISC-V instruction set architecture (ISA).

    In late 2023, members of the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) expressed concern that the Uncle Sam’s many efforts to make it hard for advanced chips to reach China are being undermined by RISC-V.

    “While the benefits of open source collaboration on RISC-V promise to be significant, it can only be realized when contributors are working with the sole aim of improving the technology, and not aiding the geopolitical interests of the PRC, the representatives wrote in a November 2023 letter that called for creation of a “robust ecosystem for open source collaboration among the US and our allies while ensuring the PRC is unable to benefit from that work.

    That’s code for “Banning sales of chips to China won’t work if Beijing can build its own using RISC-V. The Committee members therefore called on US commerce secretary Gina Raimondo to consider what might be done about RISC-V.

    RISC-V International CEO Calista Redmond defended open source collaboration, on grounds that it advances the development technology and leads to the creation of very useful things like USB and Ethernet, and pointed out that her own org is a mere publisher of a standard.

    China has made it plain that it wants more of this sort of thing, by approving only processors it can control to some extent – because their architectures allow customization – and issuing its own bans on the import of US tech.


    The original article contains 513 words, the summary contains 271 words. Saved 47%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Hello HotelEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago
    edit-2
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Edit: i was being melodramatic, I will still leave this up.

    My home country is eating away at itself. 🫤 Every day I hear news of how the US is chasing the clouds, attacking the “illusive newfound chinese power”. The US is acting like the king from double king.

    • Dark ArcEnglish
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      edit-2
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The US is trying to prevent both China and Russia from:

      • Spewing propaganda to its citizens by posing as citizens or manipulating social media algorithms
      • Taking advantage of the work it and other countries have done to advance computing
      • Stealing designs and advancing them without giving back
      • Stealing designs and using state money to undercut the competition’s pricing
      • Buying up the world while refusing to let the world buy any of China
      • Expanding their borders by violence

      Among many many other things. I think this RISC-V thing will go no where but I get why they’re looking at it.

      There’s plenty the US is getting wrong But I don’t think trying to limit China’s growth and power on the backs of western technology is one.

      • Hello HotelEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago
        edit-2
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I hope not, its extralegal. I understand what they are trying to do and still beleave they are okay with personally doing all that stuff but upset when anyone else tries. If these 3 countries keep this up, we will likely have multiple fallen empires on the world stage.

        • Dark ArcEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink
          • It’s perfectly legal. These things have been done throughout the US and European history.
          • I’m unaware of any instance of the US getting upset over an ally taking similar action.
          • I doubt it. They’re doing a lot of this because next generation warfare depends on advanced chips. They want the west to have the chips and technologies it invented and to keep them away from China and Russia so long as they continue to act hostile. It’s all to minimize the risk of global conflict by minimizing access to the “materials of war. They’re not doing this because they’re worried about Chinese and Russian gamers having too much fun.
    • PipedLinkBotBEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

      double king

      Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

      I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

  • harkEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What’s wrong, America, can’t take the competition?

    • trololololEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      No! Something something bootstraps should not work for foreign countries!