• OsaErisXero
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Can’t imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple

    • PechenteEnglish
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah exactly. Remember when they wanted to kill PWAs in Europe blaming the DMA? They had to revert course eventually due to backlash.

      • dinckelEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s very easy for them to twist the history. Losing PWA would have really sucked. I use those quite extensively, even if they aren’t perfect

        • PechenteEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Me too! I even develop some PWAs. It’s great for specialized stuff that doesn’t need to be on the AppStore.

      • DrusenijaEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Oh, I missed them having to backpedal on that! That’s good news.

    • M500English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      That was my first thought.

    • RecluseRambleEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Nah, it makes sense. Apple really likes their proprietary walled garden, so the interoperability requirements trouble them deeply.

      • AggressivelyPassiveEnglish
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        No.

        Interoperability is only required, if you have a significant market share. Apple does not have this in the EU. iMessage specifically doesn’t fall under this regulation, since hardly anyone uses it.

        And since Apple plans to publish an SDK for their intelligence anyway, you can’t really regulate them for being too closed.

        So either that’s a purely political retaliation, or their “super privacy friendly” services aren’t as privacy friendly as they claim.

        • RecluseRambleEnglish
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          edit-2
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Apple does have a significant market share of 25-30% in Europe. Just because they avoided having to open iMessage (for now) because everyone in Europe uses WhatsApp, doesn’t mean other Apple services are safe from regulation.

          But I’m with you - it’s more likely about (not so) privacy.

        • WhatAmLemmyEnglish
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          or their “super privacy friendly” services aren’t as privacy friendly as they claim.

          I would bet real currency it’s this one.

  • uzayEnglish
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Funny how companies believe they are punishing you by withholding AI crap nobody wants.

    • ByteJunkEnglish
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Data privacy AND not having to deal with more bullshit AI? Oh my, how will we ever cope with this /s

      • kateEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        wasn’t the main point of apples ai that it runs on device? asking explicitly every time it might need to send data anywhere else seems fine

        • meliaescEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          There’s apparently different tiers, where some stuff is done locally but anything slightly complex would require it go to apple’s servers.

          • kateEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            4 months ago
            edit-2
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            yeah, i remember watching the announcement live, they said that in some cases it would prompt the user, like this

            (photo taken from apples announcement blog post)

            “anything slightly complex” is an overstatement though, it would ask for some specific LLM tasks, and the vast majority of what apple has built is not LLM or even generative. to me the most useful features are prioritising notifications for a semi-dnd mode and searching for objects in photos 🤷‍♀️

            • meliaescEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              4 months ago
              edit-2
              4 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Read over it again, and there’s 3 tiers. Local, apple cloud, and then chatgpt. It won’t prompt for Apple cloud requests.

              • kateEnglish
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                4 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                thanks, i looked into apples cloud, they have this article https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/

                it all seems okay from a technical perspective but you are right that it’s not good to have to trust apple here. i would love to see a setting to prompt the user for apples cloud, in the same way that it currently prompts for chatgpt.

                • kolorafaEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  They did say that their servers dont store anything and they do some cloud “verification” before sending any data to it, but in my opiniom they should have a setting/prompt/indication for that apple cloud part too, especially as you might be on mobile.

                  The include of chatgpt with the prompt is making it confusing and making the apple cloud less talked about

  • RentlarEnglish
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Apple’s may start being salty and blame everything on anti-trust from now on.

    Why were your beans cold this morning? EU’s DMA.

    Why did you get delayed to your event? EU’s DMA.

    Why did it rain on the one day you were planning to take a trip? EU’s DMA, of course.

  • bazus1English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    sounds like EU really dodged that bullet. Good on them.

    • IsThisAnAIEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Y’all just becoming luddites afraid of big scary tech. Oh no, the big bad siri 2 is going to hurt me!!!

      • sungloctoEnglish
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Why are you using Lemmy then? Go back to reddit if you aren’t scared of them

        • dinckelEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Don’t interact with these people. He’s clearly a moron, purposefully using provocative slurs

        • TheRealKuniEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I didn’t realize Lemmy was so restrictive. 🙄

      • Sidyctism2English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Look into what the luddites actually where, instead of repeating propaganda

        • IsThisAnAIEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Lololol not sure what you even think it’s going to change.

      • wholookshereEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s what they said about bitcoin, and there’s still nothing useful at any kind of scale outside of scams.

  • themurphyEnglish
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Who cares.

    If Apple don’t want to compete fair in the market, then others will.

    And no iPhone user will miss an AI feature. Most of them don’t even understand how to use 80% of the phones features anyway.

    • UncommonBagOfLootEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      then others will

      Unfortunately, I don’t think the others want to compete fair either. It’s a big race to shove garbage to consumers.

      • themurphyEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Well, if it’s illegal to do otherwise, some must do it, because the money involved are big.

    • riodoro1English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I cant wait for all the small smartphone manufacturers and os developers to come up with their solutions.

      • vxx
        cake
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Dumb phones on the rise.

      • themurphyEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        At least it opens up for challenge.

  • anon_8675309English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I mean, can we get this in the US also?? Nobody wants this shit.

  • lliiEnglish
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Oh yes, won’t miss that.

  • rottingleafEnglish
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    By the way, how is apple intelligence different from potato intelligence?

  • stebatorEnglish
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Apple is stepping on its own tail. The correct way to implement such features is to provide API to integrate any AI with their device, not only ChatGPT. And as an example, they should provide their own completely optional app for this, which could be downloaded from the App Store. This app should not be part of iOS at all. So EU regulators cannot do anything with it or it will be harder for them to figure out ways to restrict it. And users will worry less about privacy.

    • NotMyOldRedditNameEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It probably doesn’t need to be an optional app if they’re giving you the ability to use any model you want at the OS level integration.

      When you’re using the device for the first time show a screen and let them choose AI / provide their own local model.

      I wonder how listing things alphabetical would go given apple would keep them near the top.

  • riodoro1English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Im in the eu and Im fucking devastated.

  • CareHareEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Insert bored Jeremy Clarkson meme

  • iaMLoWiQEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Google AI is already dominant there.