• sunzu
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This job seems to be more fitting for Boeing

    • acosmichippoEnglish
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      they have to build it from scratch to do that though.

      • sunzu
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Why do u hate america?

      • sunzu
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Guy is a better businessman than entire Boeing executive team tbh

  • ChicoSuave
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If a chunk of ISS falls and damages something or hurts a person, who is liable: the organization that put it up there or the one paid to take it down?

    • Ken27238
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Per the contract once spacex builds and docks the deorbit vehicle to the ISS they are hand over ownership of it to NASA. So NASA would be responsible.

  • WalnutLum
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The ISS is aging, and for safety’s sake, NASA intends to incinerate the immense facility around 2031. To accomplish the job, the agency will pay SpaceX up to $843 million, according to a statement released on June 26.

    See you guys in 2040

  • LarkinDePark
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This is the international one that the US refuses to allow China to participate in?

        • protistEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Participating countries:

           Brazil (1997–2007)
           Canada
          European Space Agency
               Belgium
               Denmark
               France
               Germany
               Italy
               Netherlands
               Norway
               Spain
               Sweden
                Switzerland
               United Kingdom
           Japan
           Russia
           United States
          
        • ian
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          International doesn’t mean every nation

  • Zachariah
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    SpaceX has won the right to tackle a monumental task: destroying the International Space Station (ISS). The demolition will shove the iconic and enormous station down through Earth’s atmosphere in a fiery display. And if anything goes wrong, a cascade of debris could rain down on our planet’s surface.

    Conceived and built in a post-cold-war partnership with Russia, the ISS, like so many of NASA’s major projects, has lasted far longer than its initial design life of 15 years. Nothing lasts forever, however, especially in the harsh environment of outer space. The ISS is aging, and for safety’s sake, NASA intends to incinerate the immense facility around 2031. To accomplish the job, the agency will pay SpaceX up to $843 million, according to a statement released on June 26. The contract covers the development of a unique deorbit vehicle to usher the unwieldy ISS to its doom yet excludes launch costs.

  • fox [comrade/them]English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They’re gonna fuck it up and crash it into Lima, I’m calling it

  • doubtingtammy
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Perfect metaphor for the US space program as a whole

  • LexamEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Not from the Onion. Also that seems a little low for a space mission.

    • weew
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Because it isn’t a Boeing contract

  • SuiXi3D
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Isn’t it in a low enough orbit that it should just come down and burn up eventually anyway? Seems like they could save a lot of money that way

    • Alexstarfire
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      To add to what others have said already, much smaller batteries, though think like lantern sized, didn’t burn up on re-entry and damaged someone’s house. NASA is already paying for that.

    • emergencyfood
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s big enough that not all of it will burn up. And you don’t want the debris to hit someone.

    • hemkoEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      There will be shit falling down due to it’s size, so the deorbit has to be controlled

  • mlgEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Just give it to some KSP players lol.

    They’ll figure out a cheap way to either send it on a near vertical entry path into the ocean, or a 150 year multi planet gravity sling into the sun.