Scott Manley video, looks like the hold down claps may have ripped the bottom off the booster, allowing it to take off.

  • Classy Hatter
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Absolutely bonkers, they were testing that thing so close to population. There are residential areas within about 1km/mile from the test site. In one of the videos, it sounds like the blast wave destroyed some window. So, even if that thing would have only exploded during the test, it would have caused harm in those areas. Luckily, it landed on an empty area.

    • gravitas_deficiencyEnglish
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The CCP has been dropping booster stages into populated areas for decades. It’s nothing new. It’s effectively standard practice for them. Also, note that none of what I said disagrees with the fact that most other nations consider this sort of thing to be wildly dangerous.

  • Match!!English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What makes it a “SpaceX Clone”, is it because it’s a reusable rocket?

    • CookieOfFortune
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      That and kerosene fuel and engine configuration (9 engines). Grid fins and landing legs etc.

    • Diplomjodler
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The fact that any headline with SpaceX in it gets more attention.

  • Questy
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Genuinely crazy situation, I don’t think that’s ever happened before. Either they underestimated the thrust they had, or they saved money on hardware. Possibly calculated shear force for the full stack instead of just the booster. Somebody is definitely fired.

    • Etterra
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      They must have bought the couplings on Temu.

  • kerrigan778
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Y’know, some of these are built so the bottom doesn’t rip off at all.

    • JohnDClayOP
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well there are a lot of these ships flying around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that rockets aren’t safe.

  • catloafEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    How do you even handle that? Do they load an actual flight program for these tests, or does it just go off uncontrolled until range safety hits the destruct button? (Do they even have range safety and a destruct button?)

  • grueEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Task failed successfully.

  • MTK
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    You should see what happened to the “original”

        • threelonmusketeersEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I don’t recall Falcon 9 ever breaking free from the test stand and launching accidentally

          • MTK
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            You are right, out of the bingo board of things that could go wrong, this one they have yet to check. Check again next year, they might get it by then!