• henfredemarsEnglish
    215 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Can’t say I’m surprised, but I will reiterate what others have already written. This bill targeting one specific social media company does little more than affirm the government’s ability to single-handedly legislate a business out of existence and maybe provide some short term benefit against foreign influences, which can simply turn their efforts to other platforms.

    If we really cared about protecting Americans, we’d pass consumer protection laws. But we don’t do that. In fact, we have worked to erode these laws for decades.

    This smells more like an excuse to brutally murder the competition for the benefit of homegrown social media. Can’t we call a spade a spade, where there’s money to be made?

    • Plastic_Ramses
      25 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Question: Do you think china would allow an adverserial nation to control a portion of their social media?

      • henfredemarsEnglish
        15 months ago
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        No. But I would also hope we’re better than China. There are tools other than a sledgehammer to get social media companies to take action against these bot farms and fake news articles.

        This is certainly an option, but I don’t think it’s a very good one.

        For example, if the algorithm is the problem, let’s require transparency or place restrictions on how algorithms can select content for users.

        • Corkyskog
          55 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Tiktok offered to do everything people are suggesting with project Texas. It would have made them the most transparent social media company in the US

          So of course Congress goes pfft nah. We still want you to sell, we don’t want transparency, we want to control the narrative.