• rockSlayer
      1455 months ago
      edit-2
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      bullshit. cis- is a latin prefix that means “on this side of”. So for example, the Roman region Cisalpine Gaul could reasonably be interpreted as “the part of Gaul that’s on our side of the Alpines”. The prefix trans- is the antonym meaning “on the far side”. Transalpine Gaul was the part of the Roman empire on the other side of the Alpines. When related to gender, the only way cisgender can be read in any context is “their gender aligns with their sex”. There is no way that could ever be reasonably be interpreted as a slur.

      • Aurenkin
        695 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Those kids on Tumblr, infamous for their coining of slurs, knowledge of Latin and history of Rome in equal measure.

        • captainlezbian
          85 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Ok but you did describe a specific chunk of rome nerds. You’ve really got three kinds of rome nerds: the “I just think it’s neat” folks, the ones who think of it as glorious western tradition and lean fascist (it’s how they turned the symbol of Roman right to rule into the “kill everyone in the name of tradition” ideology), and then there are those of us who see a society that’s full on clown shoes where a bisexual twink managed to talk his way into destroying a republic among many many many other fucking bonkers things that just kept fucking happening while this empire refused to trade with China because of dipshit toxic masculinity. So yeah us in the last group lean anti fascist because rome was a shit show of a caliber only America and Russia can compare to

        • Asafum
          75 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          OMG I love it!

          Right wing assholes get all bent out of shape over the computer world trying to do away with “master” and “slave” terminology, but they’ll rush to “cancel” using “cis” because it hurts their feefees

        • ImADifferentBirdEnglish
          375 months ago
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Most people don’t see cisgender as a slur. Only complete asshole transphobes do.

          Honestly, not even they do. They just lie about it as a gotcha.

          • Djtecha
            -85 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I’m not a fan of you assuming my identity. Did I ask to be referred to as that?

          • _cnt0
            -135 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            From wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender

            The term cisgender was coined in 1994 as an antonym to transgender, and entered into dictionaries starting in 2015 as a result of changes in social discourse about gender.[4][5] The term has been and continues to be controversial and subject to critique.

            I think there’s some confirmation bias on your end here. The local community (including me) tends to be young and liberal and knows the term cisgender. I’d bet that the majority (by a huge margin) of English speakers (including as a second or third language) has never even heard the term cisgender or doesn’t know what it means. Lots of them will react negatively if you label them cisgender out of pure ignorance and false assumptions - no transphobia needed.

            Only complete asshole transphobes do. Honestly, not even they do. They just lie about it as a gotcha.

            Sure, they exist. But what’s their percentage of the population or the X user base? I think you’re making a false generalization by an invalid extrapolation.

            And just to be clear: I’m not saying cisgender is a slur. I’m just pointing out that the notion that community A or an individual can decide whether some word is a slur or not in community B is ridiculous, and that the argument, from the first comment I replied to, for technical correctness or intended meaning of a word is irrelevant for who considers what a slur.

            I hope that made my point clearer to your dry-nosed primate’s brain.

            • ImADifferentBirdEnglish
              305 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Most people don’t hear a new word and immediately assume it’s a slur.

              Most people without an ax to grind anyway.

            • CileTheSane
              85 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I’m just pointing out that the notion that community A or an individual can decide whether some word is a slur or not in community B is ridiculous,

              As a member of group B I consider the word community a slur (purely because it is convenient for my argument to do so). Never use that word again because it is a slur and it would be ridiculous for you to say otherwise.

            • BmeBenji
              65 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I’m pretty confident the slur-status of a word is closely rated to whether or not it is used in a hateful way to refer to a people group or member of a group that is in some way disadvantaged. For example the n-word is obviously a slur and “cracker” or “whitey” obviously are not. That’s why cisgender isn’t a slur, even if people can and have use(d) it in a hateful way.

    • jmcs
      725 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      When you have a trans-something you have cis-something. It’s how language works.

      The only way for cisgender to be a slur is if you consider transgender a slur too.

      • neidu2
        135 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Now I’m curious what a cisformer would be in the context of electrical engineering

        • jmcs
          295 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Ok let me rephrase for pedantic people, adjectives with trans prefix have a correspondent cis adjective.

          And an electrical cisformer would be something that would keep energy inside the same circuit at roughly the same voltage, so basically a wire. Feel free to use the term if you want to oversell something.

          • Jesus_666
            335 months ago
            edit-2
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Cisformers
            They’re what meets the eyes
            Cisformers
            Bots not in disguise
            Robobots wage their battle to destroy the evil forces of
            The Obviouscons

          • neidu2
            185 months ago
            edit-2
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I will start using “cisformer” in place of “wire” from now on, in a similar manner to how we at work sometimes refer to “power aspect negation cycle” for pulling the plug on something and reconnect it.

            Also, I guess a cisistor would be just a regular switch or potentiometer.

        • hperrin
          25 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          A cisformer would just be a conductor (like a wire). It takes a current/voltage on one side, and gives you the same current/voltage on the other side.

          Now if we’re talking about the big robots that turn into cars, a cisformer would be a car that turns into the same car (so just any car).

      • vithigar
        25 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You could construct a cis- form of the word, but it’s not always going to be useful, or even sensible.

        Cismit? Cisaction? Cislate? Cisportation?

        • jmcs
          115 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Cismit - communicating with one self, for e.g. inner dialog

          Cisaction - an agreement with one self or within a group

          Cislate - to rephrase in the same language

          Cisportation - moving inside a boundary

          • captainlezbian
            65 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I kinda love all of these. Especially cislate, I have to do that one so often

            • samus12345English
              45 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Or to cislate your last statement, “I am required to do that one frequently.

      • PrinceWith999Enemies
        325 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Well, damn.

        The word is a threat because it linguistically separates biological sex from socially constructed categories of “woman” and “man. That gender is a social construction undermines heteronormativity, critical to defending patriarchal sex roles and procreation.

    • Catoblepas
      175 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      People on tumblr being really mad when they say cisgender doesn’t actually make it a slur ¯\_(ツ)_/¯