• Murvel
    -93 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Oh shit, was it that easy to fix climate change? To vandalize heritage sites was all it took?

      • Murvel
        -13 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Well I’d argue it does nothing. In fact, it probably is counter productive, so instead of nothing it does the opposite

    • skulblaka
      33 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Ah yes, it’s holding back the massive sweeping wave of change currently going on to fix climate change.

      No, don’t be a dumbass. It’s raising awareness, because it’s obvious nobody is giving a shit about this really fucking massive problem that is directly on our doorstep. Painting Stonehenge isn’t going to accomplish anything except be a nuisance, but being a nuisance is how you compel people to get shit done non-violently. MLK and his sit-ins pushed civil rights forward by being a nuisance. Gandhi pushed Britain out of India by being a nuisance. If you accept the status quo, the status quo will remain. You have to get out and make noise and attract a following if you want the folks in charge to pay attention to your existence.

      Trust me, you want them painting on Stonehenge for attention. This is the non-violent option. When this is ignored long enough, the non-violent option will be shelved and that’s when people will suddenly start paying attention.

      “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. - John F. Kennedy, 1962

      • afraid_of_zombies
        13 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You would accomplish much more by voting and getting two people under 30 years old to do the same.

        Also I missed the part of the civil rights movement where they blocked ambulances and threw paint on stone hedge.