• givesomefucksEnglish
    208 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yeah, but like, isn’t that where the majority of people live?

    So when talking about “most places” it makes sense for it to be “places most likely for people to live”. If it was literally “most places” America is pretty fucking empty.

    I googled it, the average price for an acre in Kansas is like 3.5k.

    In “most places” it’s cheap as hell. But no one lives there so why talk about it?

    • Pacattack57
      77 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      That’s the talking point and semantics the rich want us to believe. That there’s plenty of places to live that are cheap.

      They don’t tell the real truth that the majority of the US is desolate country and wilderness that no one wants to live or work.

    • sunzu
      58 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      100k in Phoenix or Atlanta =/= 100k NYC or SF

      • givesomefucksEnglish
        68 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        And “flyover” states 100k a year is like a millionaire

        So if going by “most places” you’d be using like 25k or even lower.

        I get what you’re saying semantically, it’s just that if we’re being that semantic it’s meaningless, so clearly the other interpretation is what was meant.

        Like, when someone uses “literally” you can tell what was intended.

        You didn’t notice the forrest because all the trees were in the way homie.

        • sunzu
          38 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          my point is that the term “middle class” is corpo propaganda