• SkyNTPEnglish
    17 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    It’s essentially a map of big countries (population, territory, population density)

    This map would be way more interesting if it was normalized per capita or some other meaningful denominator. Only then does it make sense to point fingers.

    • Specal
      87 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      UK has a higher population than Canada but had a lower rating on this scale. So that’s not strictly true.

      • originalfrozenbanana
        77 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Not to mention India and China vs. the US

        Total emissions would tell a different story but population is not the only factor here

        • Specal
          37 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          A few of the dimwits I work with use china alot as a reason to not do anything about climate change because they keep building coal plants but The coal plants they build are more efficient.

          According to this chart the UK is doing well but we can still do better and we should keep doing more.

    • Ben MatthewsEnglish
      26 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s about future oil and gas expansion (FOGE), what matters to the atmosphere is the total - identifying potential threat. Effectively multiplying FOGE by area (as shown) doesn’t make sense, but neither does FOGE per capita (as most is exported, not consumed locally). I’d suggest just a sized blob for each country - then can show some other dimension with the color.

    • volodya_ilich
      27 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      China and India have 5 times the population of the USA, and yet are 1 order of magnitude or more below the USA. You’re not making sense here