I am potentially looking at buying a new car in next coming months. I’m looking at the Nissan rogue because my current car is Nissan and I’ve been pleased with it for the past 12 years and I would like the extra room an suv has. The only thing I don’t like is that the majority of suvs are AWD. Nissan does make the rogue in FWD but I was only able to find 1 in my nearby dealerships. So it seems that if I want an suv I’m stuck with AWD or I have to stick with a sedan. For context, my first and current car is a 2012 Nissan versa.

Tldr: do the benefits of AWD and having an suv outweigh the downside of having to replace every tire if you get a flat in one with AWD. Or should I just try and stick with FWD?

EDIT: thank you for all the responses. It is very clear now that I do not need AWD and will stick with FWD. And apparently, I need to look into different cars makers. I have had good luck with my Nissan but according to comments Nissan isn’t a good company anymore.

EDIT 2: I didn’t realize that there are 2 different types of AWD. There’s full and reactive. Technically, the car I have now is AWD because it does divert power to the back wheels if it detects them slipping. My apologies for not fully understanding the terminology before making the post. My original post was directed towards full AWD, when there is power to all wheels all the time. Thanks for the help !

    • litchraleeEnglish
      11•2 months ago2 months ago

      True, and I don’t see a problem. :)

      Station wagons and utes (a la Hyundai Santa Cruz) should be a thing in the USA.

      • ArbitraryValueEnglish
        -1•2 months ago

        Well isn’t the Cybertruck technically a ute? So you’ve got that option…

        • NoxyEnglish
          1•2 months ago

          Sure, if a poptart is technically a burrito or if a bowl of cereal with milk is technically a soup

          • ArbitraryValueEnglish
            2•2 months ago2 months ago

            No, not like that. According to Wikipedia:

            Traditionally, the term referred to vehicles built on passenger car chassis and with the cargo tray integrated with the passenger body (coupé utility vehicles). However, present-day usage of the term “ute” in Australia and New Zealand has expanded to include any vehicle with an open cargo area at the rear, which would be called a pickup truck in other countries.

            If you search for “cybertruck ute” you’ll find many publications from Australia and New Zealand calling it that, but I’m talking about the narrower first definition. It’s hard to say whether or not the Cybertruck chassis is a “passenger car” chassis because it is unique, but the cargo tray of the Cybertruck is in fact integrated with the passenger body. (Pickup trucks according to the American definition have a gap in the body between the cabin and the truck bed, and the Cybertruck does not.) You can argue that the Cybertruck is a pickup truck in the American sense since it claims to have a carrying capacity of 2,500 pounds (definitely more than utes generally do, if you trust that number) but it does look like a ute.

            The Cybertruck owner’s manual reveals you can carry up to 1,310 pounds in the bed, 441 in the frunk, and 220 in the under-bed storage compartment. The remaining 529 pounds must go in the cab.

            • NoxyEnglish
              1•2 months ago

              ahhh I didn’t know the term was broader than el camino style coupes

    • NoxyEnglish
      4•2 months ago

      The station wagon is the pinnacle of passenger car design!

    • Jimmybander
      3•2 months ago

      Fuck yeah you are. Volvo XC70 rules.

      • ArbitraryValueEnglish
        1•2 months ago2 months ago

        Do they issue you two or three annoying kids to drive around when you buy one of those, or do you have to bring your own?

        (My attitude about cars is, to paraphrase Gaston, “The most impractical car in town. That makes it the best!”)