I understand that weather on TV can’t be hyperlocally accurate. But a weather app on my phone has my exact GPS coordinates. Why can’t it tell me exactly when a rain cloud will be passing over my location?

It’s gotten to the point where I just use precipitation maps to figure out my rain chances for the day.

The hourly forecast is mostly useless because it’s not a chance % but a % of the area that will be raining.

  • givesomefucksEnglish
    132 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    But a weather app on my phone has my exact GPS coordinates. Why can’t it tell me exactly when a rain cloud will be passing over my location?

    Because they’ve never been able to do that

    When they say 50% chance of rain”, it doesn’t meant there’s a 50/50 chance it rains where you’re located

    It’s that for the broadcast area, about half is gonna get rain.

    • folekaule
      192 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Unless I misunderstood what you said, that’s not it either. 50% chance of rain means exactly that: according to their forecast models, there is a 50% change it will rain. Snopes did a writeup of this.

      • WolfLink
        132 months ago
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Key word “in the given forecast area”.

        The statement “there’s a 40% chance of rain at any given point at any given time in the forecast area/period” is an average over both area and time.

        Many different actual distributions of rain could result in that average, including a 100% chance of it raining 100% of the time in 40% of the are or a 40% chance of it raining in 100% of the time in 100% of the area, and a 100% chance of it raining 40% of the time in 100% of the area. Real distributions are typically messier than that.

      • sem
        -122 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Can’t trust snopes any more

          • kitnaht
            -162 months ago
            edit-2
            2 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Reading Snopes will give you plenty. Read the articles - and a lot of them use weasel-wording to push the result they want.

            I don’t have the exact article on hand at the moment, but an example would be someone claiming that clear-cutting 1000 acres of trees would destroy [X]^3 of CO2 reduction; and then Snopes will “fact check” it by saying they aren’t cutting down 1000 acres of trees this year. Often times they’ll ‘debunk’ something that sounds like the claim, but isn’t the actual claim.

            • AmidFuror
              82 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              That’s not a correct understanding of how Snopes works. They debunked this.

        • linearchaosEnglish
          62 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          yeah, never mind the references in the article where they pointed out the evidence for their conclusions. :P

    • Pasta Dental
      62 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s that for the broadcast area, about half is gonna get rain.

      Isn’t that virtually the same thing as a 50% chance of rain at my position though?

      • givesomefucksEnglish
        12 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah

        And it wants a definitive answer for the exact location they’re standing in

        Which isn’t possible

      • Rhynoplaz
        -22 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, kind of. It’s going to rain. That’s the forecast. That rain will effect half of the area in their forecast range.

    • criticon
      22 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      No it doesn’t, it means that under those conditions, about 50% of the times it has rained in that area