• ampersandrewEnglish
    172 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    You can still play Quake 2 regardless of player count, and the same goes for Palworld. If you want to play with other people, invite them. A live service game, barring a few exceptions that I can probably count on my fingers, ceases to exist if there aren’t enough players to populate servers and drive recurring revenue. And the thing about that is that player decline is inevitable. The issue with shutting it down is that no one can play that game anymore.

    • Snot FlickermanEnglish
      02 months ago
      edit-2
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      So don’t buy a game that doesn’t come with a server you can host yourself if they ever shut down.

      Honestly, that’s on the people buying those shitty games. They exist because people buy them. Sorry.

      Shit like Valheim exists, shit like Project Zomboid exists, it’s not like they don’t continue to make new games in the style of Quake 2 where you can play them indefinitely, even if they’ve stopped being supported.

      • ampersandrewEnglish
        142 months ago
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s exactly what I do. But the article is about how, even though Palworld isn’t one of those games, there’s an unhealthy expectation that every game is. And to be fair to the consumer, it’s so, so hard to find out if the game you’re buying will survive a server shutdown. Often times I have to ask the devs in Steam forums for an answer to the question, because that kind of thing isn’t clearly listed on the store page.

      • ArmokGoBEnglish
        12 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        People (as in the People) run the market, and they are fucking morons. People also run the government, which is why there’s no legislation preventing the dark patterns and other predatory bullshit that game publishers push nowadays.