EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

  • Sgn
    -61 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Russia has 5000 nukes, if the US is not involved, Europe will be toast

    • Jimmybander
      81 month ago
      link

      NATO would ensure that the US is involved. We’re aligned with the Europeans.

      • AndrewZabarEnglish
        11 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Doesn’t Drumpf plan to remove us from NATO? Or am I remembering wrongly what I read?

        • the_crotch
          11 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Trump probably gets rock hard at the idea of having an excuse to hit the nuke button so leaving NATO wouldn’t even be a deal breaker

        • Jimmybander
          11 month ago
          link

          Yeah, well. He is going to prison.

          • AndrewZabarEnglish
            130 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            He will never see a second in prison, don’t kid yourself.

            • Jimmybander
              129 days ago
              link

              He deserves it.

              A boy can dream, can’t he?

              • AndrewZabarEnglish
                229 days ago
                edit-2
                29 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                Personally, I wish that jackass who shot his ear had been a better shot. What a waste of such an opportunity.

    • NoiseColor
      61 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Even without US. UK has nukes, France has nukes. You don’t need a lot to destroy Russia. Basically just two.