“Kenny just began to gasp for air repeatedly and the execution took about 25 minutes total.

Pretty compassionate way to kill a person.

Once again, the Law in the south is brutal.

  • AdmiralShatEnglish
    438 months ago
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    As someone well versed in inhaling Nitrous Oxide, why not not just use Nitrous Oxide? That’d be a quick way out, and it’s cheap, you can buy enough to kill a person on Amazon for like $30. Even if you fuck it up, they’re unconscious and feeling nothing.

    • Revan343
      488 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Same reason they don’t just OD them on morphine: those are enjoyable drugs, and we can’t be giving our death row inmates that.

    • ricecake
      468 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      There’s functionally no difference. The way that they messed this up would have still created suffering because they weren’t letting carbon dioxide escape.

      The suffocation feeling comes from CO2 buildup, not lack of oxygen. The same issue can happen with nitrous oxide if you don’t let the CO2 escape.

      • 7heo
        258 months ago
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Also, and keep in mind I have never killed myself using this method, so I don’t know first hand, but, nitrogen is lighter than carbon dioxide, so if the person had 100% pure nitrogen to breathe, and no carbon dioxide, and is maintained with their head near the top of the pod, they would have died fast and allegedly without feeling it.

        However, I am absolutely convinced that the people responsible for this execution did research on how to make this method as painful as possible (done right, it is apparently euphoric, and there is NO WAY they would even remotely take the risk of this happening), so they probably went out of their way to have a nitrogen-oxygen mix (like our atmosphere), but with lower amounts of oxygen, and forced the person to stay in a position that would guarantee they would die from CO2 asphyxiation rather than nitrogen.

        It is even more inhumane than just using CO2 (as is done in meat “production”), because it prolongs the suffering quite a lot The whole point of using CO2 on animals is to expedite the process at the expense of their suffering.

        • oatscoopEnglish
          28 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          CO2 is also cheap and safer for human workers.

          Nitrogen is undetectable with human senses, whereas you’ll instantly know if you enter an area with a high CO2 concentration. CO2 is also heavier than air, so it tends to stay in the “pit” they lower the animals into.

      • astral_avocado
        18 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        So their problem was they didn’t vent his exhalation? And only let him breath in pure nitrogen?

        • PopMyCopEnglish
          28 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m going to take a wild guess here and say no one knows. The folks who put the mask on the dude are probably not any sort of experts in masks, gas, or not being an ass, and everyone in this thread is speculating.

    • GladiusB
      -268 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The liquid? It would be excruciating. Burning your insides with frostbite.

      • BigFatNipsEnglish
        508 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You’re thinking of liquid nitrogen. Nitrous oxide is commonly found in whip cream cannisters, and is actually quite pleasurable imo.