• Th4tGuyII
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Who knew all you needed to make yourself above the law was appoint your own judges The level of corruption going on in front of our eyes is astounding, they’re barely even trying to hide it at this point.

    • KoboldCoterieEnglish
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      They’re banking on the assumption that they won’t have to once Trump wins the election.

      • snooggumsEnglish
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        They are banking on the fact that impeaching judges is both extemely rare and very time consuming.

        • obviouspornalt
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          And that a Republican-held house of representatives will never impeach.

        • PenisWenisGenius
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          edit-2
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If the birth rate keeps declining, theoretically some day they’ll be forced to implement policies that help instead of harm people. You can fight by making sure as many people as possible are aware of this.

          • jonne
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            3 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            They’d probably reinstate slavery before they do that.

            • boydsterEnglish
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              3 months ago
              edit-2
              3 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              You’ve caused me now to imagine a reality where the stupid thing that orange asshole advocates changes from “they aren’t sending their brightest” to “we literally can’t trap enough of them here” and I don’t like it

  • LEDZeppelin
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Media will be picking up on that “rigged judiciary” at any moment now

    • henfredemarsEnglish
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Anyone with half a brain knows it’s a blatantly corrupt system having little to do with law.

        • tuck182
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          You’re right, but not in the way you think you are.

  • credo
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump

  • randon31415
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This might be good news: instead of drawing out the case for 10 years, the judge just ruled all special prosecutors are unconstitutional. If the appeals court reverses thus ridiculous rulling, we might see the trial much sooner.

    • qevlarr
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      SCOTUS: Isn’t there somebody you forgot to ask?

  • bradorsomething
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m in NZ right now and 2 people have asked if I’m home shopping.

  • --Cincinnatus--English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    130
    ·
    3 months ago
    edit-2
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Jack Smith wasn’t appointed by the President and wasn’t confirmed by the Senate. That’s the reason for the dismissal. It was obviously just a partisan hit job

    • cabron_offsets
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Where the fuck in the constitution is there a stipulation that a prosecutor in the executive branch has to be confirmed by the senate? You people can’t keep your shit straight with your “unitary executive” wet dream. Worthless traitor garbage.

      • braindefragger
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        No you don’t understand. Commenter was told these talking points. There’s no “thinking” happening here. 🐑

    • snooggumsEnglish
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      A judge that Trump appointed throwing out a case against Trump is ruling based on partisan politics.

    • WanderingVentra
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Special prosecutors have been allowed through legal cases for 30 years now at least. They are settled law. Hell, they used one on Hunter Biden recently I believe.

      • FireTower
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The fact that something deemed unconditional has happened a lot before doesn’t justify it as constitutional. Only text can do that.

        • BrokenGlepnir
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Congress passed a law deligating the power to the AG. There was a congressional vote to put that law into place. Congress doesn’t need to vote on every police officer that the president hires do they?

    • tortina_original
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Do you actually require help breathing or you manage it on your own?

    • BigMacHole
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It was an OFFICIAL ACT OF THE PRESIDENCY and therefore LEGAL according to the Supreme Court!