• Granbo's Holy Hotrod
    1192 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yeah. His family was conservative and pro-2A. Whatever the narrative is here, it isn’t a left-wing thing. The way the right has a fetish for guns, no one is surprised.

    • Kalkaline
      -682 months ago
      edit-2
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’m not saying this guy is definitely a lefty, I don’t think they have enough information to say anything with a lot of confidence yet. He had a one time donation to Act Blue, which doesn’t mean a lot, and he was a registered Republican, which also doesn’t mean a ton either.

      There are plenty of 2A lefties that own guns too, a couple of my friends are darn near progressive (US progressive, not EU progressive) and own a decent number of rifles, shotguns, and pistols. Owning a gun or multiple guns does not automatically make you a right winger, at least not in America.

      I don’t pretend to know what this guy was thinking though. Just saying it’s still early and we don’t know a ton.

      • TrickDacy
        802 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah so what if he registered Republican and his classmates talk at length about how conservative he was? He’s probably a communist because he supposedly gave $15 once to act blue /s

        • Chaotic EntropyEnglish
          52 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If anything, making a donation in his name to a left leaning organisation seems like a middle finger pointed at him.

        • Kalkaline
          -252 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I haven’t read any reports on what his classmates are saying. I’m not jumping to conclusions. I’m just saying it’s early and there is a ton of misinformation and owning a gun or multiple guns doesn’t automatically make him a right winger, it’s just one data point.

          • GiuseppeAndTheYetiEnglish
            32 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            What ton of misinformation are you reading? Other than dipshits trying to spin it as a conspiracy to raise his polling numbers.

      • Flying Squid
        222 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You know the fun thing about using nuance? It doesn’t matter one red penny if Republicans aren’t doing it too.

        • Phenomephrene
          72 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The pursuit of truth is righteous. Other people being willfully ignorant does nothing to diminish that.

            • Phenomephrene
              122 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Has nothing to do with being snobby toward other people. It has everything to do with holding yourself to a standard.

              If Adlai Stevenson had a marketing problem that’s something else entirely. Learning lessons from his faults itself seems like a pursuit of truth.

              • Flying Squid
                -32 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Good luck winning elections by holding yourself to a standard. I’ve yet to see that work, but I’m sure this time

                • Phenomephrene
                  82 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  We’re talking past each other here. I presume I’m no less invested in keeping fascists out of office than you are. That doesn’t provide any excuse not to fully inform myself, or to pretend that something is anything other than what it really is.

                  You’re talking in context of the upcoming election. I’m talking in context of not abandoning reality. Discarding nuance because other people are irrational doesn’t serve you well in the broader scheme. Let them be confidently wrong. They aren’t going to care what your argument is regardless of what you say, so serve yourself better by giving things their due consideration.

      • dogslayeggs
        192 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        He had a one time donation to Act Blue

        That wasn’t him. That was a 70 year old guy from a different suburb with the same name. Stop spreading this misinformation.

      • shalafiEnglish
        42 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Owning a gun or multiple guns does not automatically make you a right winger, at least not in America.

        Louder for those in the back.

  • recapitated
    952 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Shrug I always assume gun enthusiasts have a dozen or more. If you’re going to have one or two, you may as well have a dozen. You can only pop one at a time anyway.

    I know many folks don’t like guns but since guns are allowed, it’s worth understanding that collecting them and learning about them is a hobby just like any other.

    • neidu2
      212 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      All gun enthusiasts I know have many. And if I could be arsed going through the necessary paperwork of getting ownership permits (Not murican), I would as well.

      • Tujio
        92 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Guns are like tattoos. If you’re into them, you probably have a bunch.

    • ikiddEnglish
      42 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’m not what you’d call an “enthusiast”, I just hunt. And between friends and relatives, you just kinda end up with extra shotguns and rifles. I give some to new hunters but it seems like the old relatives all get out of it and if they know you hunt, you end up with them

      I read these stories about “lunatic gunman had a dozen firearms” and cue up look-away-meme.

    • Scubus
      12 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I dunno, a friend of mine has a couple mp5s and you can definitely akimbo them. It’s absurdly fun too

  • FireTower
    592 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Worth keeping in mind the dude is 20 and lives with his parents. The vast majority of them probably aren’t his. The economy isn’t that good.

  • thesporkeffect
    482 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This is super, SUPER normal for this area. Seriously. This is like announcing the shooter had a dog and propane grill in the back yard.

    • aseriesoftubes
      122 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      This is super, SUPER normal for this area.

      I mean, “more than a dozen” covers a lot of ground. Does that mean 15? Sure, that’s probably normal. 50? That’s weird.

      • makyoEnglish
        92 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Oh but you know NBC would say DOZENS! if there were 50.

      • NoSpotOfGround
        52 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Does that mean 15? Sure, that’s probably normal.

        Americans are weird.

        • aseriesoftubes
          22 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          To this American, yes, 15 is a weird number of guns to have. But some types of folk, especially in rural areas, are just different.

      • SupraMario
        -42 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        50 is not weird, it’s just like any other hobby, and you can’t shoot really more than 1 at a time accurately anyways.

          • SupraMario
            -12 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I mean it’s really not. The is nothing wrong with liking mechanical things. Is it weird to have a collection of anything?

  • gAlienLifeformOP
    432 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Relatedly (arc),

    In 2016 the Trump campaign built a database profiling millions of voters in key battleground states – including the family of Trump’s would-be assassin Thomas Crooks.

    It found that both the parents of Thomas Crooks were very likely to be gun owners and shared other gun-related lifestyle indicators.

  • givesomefucksEnglish
    372 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    As part of their investigation into what could have motivated Thomas Crooks to carry out the shooting, the FBI accessed his cellphone — but a preliminary analysis found the information was not helpful for investigators, a senior U.S. law enforcement official said.

    The thing is, we legitimately can’t believe them.

    It may just be after the Vegas shooter they stopped saying they found motive if they’re not gonna release the motive.

    • Phen
      232 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      My guess is that the motive is the same as every school shooting, except that shooting at schools became too normie now.

      And if there has to be shootings, I personally wouldn’t mind replacing the usual targets to politicians instead of school kids.

      • werefreeatlast
        42 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Thoughts and prayers?..nah, this was a poohLahteetian! We need legislation pronto!

    • BeMoreCarefulEnglish
      12 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah, that Vegas shooting dropped out of the news quickly. So did that theater shooting in Colorado.

      I feel like my worry is that they have some valid salient arguments and then put something like: this is the only way to get on the news/protest anymore or I have no idea what, something that doesn’t sound bad shit insane.

      If someone wants a race war or something the news is all over it.

  • AllNewTypeFace
    272 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What were they expecting to find? A pile of Blåhaj? The Communist Manifesto?

  • Funderpants
    182 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The headline is about the guns but the article section on Data is really interesting, especially if you don’t know how they score potential voters for targeted messages.

  • Why9
    152 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Why are they still saying “suspected” shooter?

    How much evidence does one need before they can definitely say something?

    • NollijEnglish
      262 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      He was never convicted in a court of law. They are always “suspected ______” until they are “convicted _____”. Since we don’t try people posthumously (yet), they will never be convicted.

      Colloquially, people will just stop saying that detail. But it’s still there.

      • IamSparticlesEnglish
        42 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, I imagine once the investigation is closed, they’ll stop using “suspected”.

  • dmtalon
    142 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Breaking News: Man who used gun owns more than one gun.

  • Treczoks
    112 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Oh imagine the surprise! People with an unhealthy gun fetish have other mental issues, too!

  • Corvidae
    52 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What other kinds of guns were found? I mean specifics. Handguns? Shotguns? Rifles?

      • Corvidae
        22 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Wasn’t what I had in mind. Why did the Crooks choose the AR15?

        • Theoriginalthon
          22 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          My Googlefu says you can get a cheap rifle for $500, maybe because it’s the cheapest rifle with a magazine?

          I don’t know I’m in the UK

          • SupraMario
            12 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s a very cheap rifle to build and cheap to buy as well. Poverty ponies is a thing.

            • deadbeef79000
              12 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Poverty ponies

              I just tried googling this and found nothing useful. I did find some gatekeeping on ar15.com though.

              • SupraMario
                22 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                It’s not an actual rifle brand or anything, its just a nickname for cheap ass ARs. Basically like a PSA lower kit and a cheap upper. I’ve built a few with couch change.

    • Madison420
      52 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Not really, a collection of 1 isn’t really a collection is it?

  • SirDerpy
    42 months ago
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Little bit of hunting experience here. Let’s say I’m hunting a deer.

    If I miss no big deal. The problems begin when the shot hits the deer but doesn’t kill it. Their adrenaline sours the meat. And, one needs to chase it down to humanely kill it. No matter how hard I try I’ll eventually miss and maim a deer.

    I do two things preventatively: First, I don’t take a shots without good chance of a one shot kill. Second, I’m always prepared ASAP to send the second round, and a third. My accuracy drops severely for the fourth in practice. So, I don’t shoot a fourth outside of practice.

    This shooter couldn’t close the range for a better shot. He also wasn’t prepared for a miss. The second round should be down range almost immediately, even on a bolt action and especially on a wisely chosen bolt action. He was a smidgeon of humility away from a greatly increased chance of success.

    • queermunist she/her
      -142 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      And, one needs to chase it down to humanely kill it.

      I hate to be the one to point this out buuut there’s an even more humane thing you could do. Y’know. Just saying.

      • Tiefling IRL
        192 months ago
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        If it’s anything like where I grew up, the deer population is massive and actually benefits from controlled culling. Also venison is delicious, and I know some hunters will literally give the extra meat away since a single deer has a lot of it, oftentimes to food pantries.

        Obligatory disclaimer: I’m leftist as fuck and actually prefer a low meat diet. But deer hunting does have benefits.

        • SirDerpy
          112 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Exactly. They feed on the local crops and we can’t magically make wolves and coyotes appear. There’s many negative impacts of not hunting, including many car accidents. And, it’s meat raised on crops stolen from mega-corporations that are artificially inflating the cost of food.

          Once we take back the means of production and begin to heal the environmental cause of too much deer, I’ll stop hunting and eating them. Fair?

        • rayyy
          32 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          They actually hire professionals to shoot deer in some urban areas in Pennsylvania where they cause problems. Farmers hire professionals because of the massive crop damage they do. Hunters are free deer harvesters, in fact they pay to hunt them.

        • queermunist she/her
          -112 months ago
          edit-2
          2 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Deer are out of control because we hunted all the predators because meat farms needed to protect their product.

          You’ve slotted yourself into the place of natural predators, but that does not actually fix anything!

          • FireTower
            92 months ago
            edit-2
            2 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I think you’re underplaying the historical significance of wool and how agricultural lands for growing plants also played a massive role in destroying the habitat of those predators (toss in timber in there too).

          • AmbiguousPropsEnglish
            82 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Yes and now it’s on the citizens to take the place of those missing natural predators - the meat farms sure aren’t going to do it, especially by your logic.

            You kind of just talked yourself into a circle.

          • FireTower
            132 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Let me clarify because apparently it wasn’t obvious. My stance is that industrial raised livestock often experience poor quality living conditions. Hunting offers a death far less insufferable than most deer would see otherwise, and a regulated harvest is critical in areas that deer’s natural predators have been extirpated like much of the populated US. Without this populations would bloom past the carrying capacity of the ecosystem leading to disease, famine, and increased death on both parties in auto accidents.

            The people eating venison are swapping it in for a steak not a salad. People make jokes about vegans because of individuals who don’t acknowledge that animal welfare isn’t a binary matter but one on a spectrum. Painting it as a binary simply dissuades non vegans from taking any incremental step to increasing their welfare.

      • Godric
        42 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Better than starvation or jumping in front of cars.

  • werefreeatlast
    -42 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    That’s the guy’s house? Wow! Man I love my life in this tiny 2000sqft house. Like how do you end up doing dumb shit when you’re living the dream in a big ass garage shed like that?

      • werefreeatlast
        12 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        My parents had a two bedroom for 6 people!

        I’d be happy living with whoever if they let me have a big ass garage like that.