Stametstotumblr@lemmy.world·9 months agoLiterally no one knows(lemmy.world)imagearrow-up1938arrow-down116message-square149fedilink
arrow-up1922arrow-down1imageLiterally no one knows(lemmy.world)Stametstotumblr@lemmy.world·9 months agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-squareSagifuriusarrow-up9arrow-down0·9 months agolinkfedilinkThese numbers all come from people who preferred 12 and 60 as their working base numbers, not 10. A lot of it becomes really elegant once you understand that.
minus-squareBuddyTheBeefaloarrow-up6arrow-down0·9 months agoedit-29 months agolinkfedilinkDid they use duodecimal or sexagesimal numeral systems? 66 feet does not match that, also its 1 chain * 10 chains.
minus-squareironeaglarrow-up5arrow-down0·9 months agolinkfedilinkand 10 chains = 1 furlong = 1/8 mile
minus-squareSagifuriusarrow-up3arrow-down4·9 months agolinkfedilinkYa if you know that, you know what I’m talking about and just want to argue.
minus-squareBuddyTheBeefaloarrow-up4arrow-down0·9 months agoedit-29 months agolinkfedilinkI do think a duodecimal system is elegant, I don’t see it being used with these numbers. edit: ok, 660/12=55
These numbers all come from people who preferred 12 and 60 as their working base numbers, not 10. A lot of it becomes really elegant once you understand that.
Did they use duodecimal or sexagesimal numeral systems?
66 feet does not match that, also its 1 chain * 10 chains.
and 10 chains = 1 furlong = 1/8 mile
Common denominator stuff.
Ya if you know that, you know what I’m talking about and just want to argue.
I do think a duodecimal system is elegant, I don’t see it being used with these numbers.
edit: ok, 660/12=55