• Trump and his supporters are slamming Joe Biden for quitting the race and endorsing Kamala Harris.
  • Some members of MAGA world are bemoaning the millions of dollars spent running against Joe Biden.
  • Biden’s withdrawal also means Trump is now the oldest candidate in the presidential race.
  • brandonEnglish
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Maybe they will start to realize the persistent election cycle is not a good thing. I would love to see a ban on all election campaigning until 90 days before said election but that wouldn’t get past a 1st amendment challenge.

    • mozz
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago
      edit-2
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Just do publicly funded elections, including things like publicly funded frequent small debates where the candidates had to appear as reasonably competent adults who could defend their ideas, and resurrect some of the regulations like the fairness doctrine and caps on media consolidation

      The dogshit quality of the current election coverage is mostly a problem because it is the only type of coverage that is available. I think if there was a widely available and well funded type of election coverage that wasn’t this cash grab horse race ad supported bullshit, the bullshit would have to compete against it and would lose and improve as a result.

      • Semi-Hemi-LemmygodEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        How about publicly funded elections and limits on campaigning more than 90 days before an election?

        • frezik
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If you limit when the public funds are dispersed, then there won’t be much campaigning outside that time frame.

    • iAvicenna
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Lets start by putting a cap on how much money can be spent on campaigns and keep it at a very minimal level.

      • kent_ehEnglish
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Start by eliminating superPACs.

      • barsquid
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Sounds good. We’ll just need to re-do Citizens United with fewer than 5 fully regressive appointees purchased by billionaires.

      • crank0271
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Cap it at like $30. You can run an ad in the student newspaper of your choice.

      • frezik
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        If it’s robust enough that it actually limits campaign spending without loopholes, then that alone might do it. Campaigns would have to use their funds more strategically, and the best time to spend is in the weeks before an election, not a year out.

      • InternetUser2012
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’ll never work, big donors will just hide it or do the advertising themselves unrelated of course