• cmnyboEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      That would be great for a server, but 1.7GHz is a bit slow for a desktop.

      • TarballEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        edit-2
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Up to 128 cores. Not meant for gaming, but it cranks at server tasks, compiling & coding tasks, etc.

        There’s a windows dev kit (ARM) that I think is 3ghz: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/d/windows-dev-kit-2023

        But bleeding edge stuff from MS means likely driver issues, and this isn’t something you’ll throw a dedicated graphics card in.

        Still, feels like the tide is changing away from Intel. I too was looking at ARM for Desktop” options a couple weeks back.

        • aardEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I have a 96 core one. While it’ll be fine as a desktop for compiling I’d stick with an AMD system.

          The devkit has 6 memory channels, and you’ll want to fill them all - there’s a surprisingly high performance penalty if you don’t. Even then, compiling a code base which could be spread over hundreds of cores is still significantly slower on the ampere compared to my old 3970x.

      • PeffseEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        My first thought went to the Milk-V Pioneer since it has mATX form factor, but both products are priced way higher than your average desktop.

        https://milkv.io/pioneer

      • umbrellaEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        not to mention its a dev kit. at this point not everything will run\be problem free.