More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis, and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.

  • xkforceEnglish
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    A lot of people died rather than help them so yes I would judge the shit out of someone that helps a nazi knowing full well what they are.

    • topinambour_rexEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The person I mention in my previous post, is this man. As he was along the french riviera, looking for intels, he ended in this situation, that there was no vacancy in hotels, and he finally got a hotel room, by fixing the long distance radio. How do you judge the shit out of him, by curiosity ?

      • xkforceEnglish
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Removed by mod