• irish_linkEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m down with you being all in on the statement but I have a question for you.

    What would you consider Punk in 1990 or even 94?

    • not_that_guy05English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Like coming out in those years or still playing during those years?

      • irish_linkEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        3 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I would day both. What do you consider punk during that time?

        • not_that_guy05English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Narcoleptic youth, total chaos, rancid, one way system, nofx, penny wise.

          Playing? TSOL, circle jerks, the adicts, D.I, the exploited

          • irish_linkEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            On Wikipedia Rancid, NOFX, Penny Wise all have a similar paragraph about all the other bands that came out of the same area and Green Day is in all of them.

            Green Day may have shifted over time into Rock or Pop Punk as you say but make no mistake when they originated they were Punk. Especially if NOFX, Penny Wise, and Rancid is. The problem is that when a band hits it, they are usually tagged with whatever they were defined as from then on. So they are punk because they were originally punk. I know I am arguing and I am not meaning to. Just trying to point out that there isn’t much reason to say they aren’t punk anymore.

            It’s like my argument about “hover boards” I lost that one a long time ago and it doesn’t help anyone to keep correcting people an say it’s not a hoverboard. The name stuck from the start.