• danEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    2 months ago
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Supporting the ad-driven internet

    The thing is that there’s not really a good alternative. There’s real costs in running a service - servers, bandwidth, staff, etc. Either you pay for content directly (subscription services), someone else pays for you (which is the case with many Lemmy servers where admins are paying out of their own pockets), or ads cover the cost for you. People want to use the web for free, so ad-supported content is going to be around for a long time.

    • explodicleEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I would rather pay for works directly, so I prefer a browser with no ads ever.

      • danEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        2 months ago
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Sure, that makes sense. A lot of people can’t afford that though, especially in poorer countries.

        • explodicleEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          2 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          But then advertising to them is less lucrative too.

    • tabularEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I disliked adverts so much as a time waster of limited human life. There may not be a good alternative to dumping toxic waste into a river, for example, but I still think we shouldn’t do it.

      Can’t speak for others but I do donate (not as much as I’d like) to Wikipedia and buy merch from some creators (if I like it for what it is).