US President Joe Biden has said he is not confident there will be a peaceful transition of power if Donald Trump loses the presidential election in November.

"[Trump] means what he says, we don’t take him seriously. He means it, all this stuff about ‘if we lose it will be a bloodbath’.

Mr Trump’s comment that it would “be a bloodbath for the country” if he loses the election, made as he was talking about the auto industry in March, triggered a wave of criticism.

The Trump campaign, however, said the comment was specifically about the auto industry and had been deliberately taken out of context. It sent a fundraising email which said Trump’s political opponents and others had been “viciously” misquoting him.

  • SaltySalamander
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If it wasn’t a broken mess, why would anyone be wanting to change it?

    • glizzardEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      How can people not see that given the current context, ranked choice pools only worsen the chances of progressives even being on the ticket.

        • glizzardEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          As if that was ever going to happen, everyone can wrap themselves in their solutions all they want. We’re long past fucked anyway

            • glizzardEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Why even comment if everyone must agree? Shitty leftists are shitty, next at 11.

                • glizzardEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Oh it’s not? All I say is “maybe we shouldn’t allow corporations to literally buy all the politicians” and all of you people are like “i like it when bought politicians are legitimized by ranks”. If the shit-tier links presented above are enough to wholly sway you in implementing RC voting before securing your election system via delegitimizing legal bribery, then go ahead and listen. I simply presented an opposing opinion, one that is quite literally in line with the current status quo. You’re the ones out here trying to convince me. But whatever. Bots.

                  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    False again

                    Edit: I get it, this is one of the first time in your life when you thought you would step out and show everyone your brilliant ideas. That’s good, but you need to learn that being contrarian isn’t just opposing all external view points. Contrarians are only useful when they use rigor and data to expose weaknesses in any course of action. Hurling accusations at people is not an argument, or at least a very convincing one.