• DragonTypeWyvern
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Prion diseases can take decades to show symptoms, like with CJD, and are very hard to test for in humans.

    It might not be a question of whether it can jump species barriers, but when we will know it did, which is why the CDC can’t and won’t ring any alarm bells, just advise caution, until it’s either too late for individuals or a confirmed non-issue.

    There was a study that claimed it had jumped to chimps/monkeys in a testing environment but last I heard it was disputed, but that still leaves the average citizen with plenty of reason to not

    Checks notes

    Eat a diseased animal.

    Source your venison, it should be tested if it’s from an affected area but you never can trust suppliers for wild game.

    Consider just eating, you know, cow, or only venison from a trusted source.

    Preferably the person that shot and had it butchered.

    • WetBeardHairs
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Consider just eating, you know, cow, or only venison from a trusted source.

      Preferably the person that shot and had it butchered.

      Eat the person who shot the deer? Dang that’s some extreme veganism.

      • creamed_eels
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Do you want to get Kuru? Because that’s how you get Kuru!

        • chiliedogg
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Only if you eat the uncooked brain iirc.

      • starman2112
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Fun fact, human is the only meat that can be vegan! They just have to consent to it

        • commieEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago
          edit-2
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          it’s still exploiting an animal. it’s not vegan.

          edit: this user seems to think theyn can poison the well so that readers will be misled about what words mean. I encourage you to actually learn.

          • starman2112
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s not exploitation if they consent, that’s the entire point of veganism

            Edit: instead of reading this entire ridiculous comment chain with commie consistently being wrong about everything they say, here’s the part where I won the argument

            • commieEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              it is. consent has nothing to do with exploitation.

              • starman2112
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                edit-2
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                This is nonsense. If I have a thing, and I give you that thing freely and of my own volition, you have not exploited me. If we’re going to say that that’s necessarily exploitation, then all transactions are exploitative, and nothing could be considered vegan except for growing your own vegetables in the wild. No, human-derived food can be vegan, as is the case with milk.

                • commieEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  taking something to use it is the barest definition of exploitation.

                  • starman2112
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Sure, it’s the most braindead definition you can use, and it ignores the very concept of why vegans are vegan in the first place. Big “gender=sex is basic biology” energy here

                • commieEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  No, human-derived food can be vegan, as is the case with milk.

                  too many commas there.

                  No human-derived food can be vegan, as is the case with milk.

                  • starman2112
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    My friend. If even PETA agrees that human milk is vegan, you can be damn sure that human milk is vegan.

    • Rolder
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      There’s also the option of just not eating venison if you’re really worried.

    • wildginger
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The issue is that deer dont eat each other often enough for that to be how they spread it among each other.

      So whatever vector is moving it around in them, which we dont actually know yet, is the more likely risk of an actual jump. Cant not take a risk if you cant tell if its risky.