• narc0tic_birdEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Because enough people will then buy the game twice that it’s worth the very slight reputation loss for them.

    • magic_smokeEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      2 months ago
      edit-2
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Also because they can rush the console port out quicker without having to drop a half-baked PC port.

      For what its worth, I remember GTA V looking good, being preformant, and having the same amount of bugs you’d expect to find in any other open world sandbox game. No more, no less. Also the options panel was reasonably detailed.

      That being said the ports for GTA III/VC/SA are clunky as shit, and the framerate dependency is a fucking joke that shouldn’t have been considered acceptable even back then. Even GTA IV had a lot of issues, but those are all like 15-20 years old at this point. It’s almost as irrelevant as complaining about Max Payne not working under Win XP, despite being less than a year old when the OS launched.

      • conciselyverboseEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Their DRM or whatever they were doing with logging into rockstar was a giant pain in the dick. It meaningfully changed the amount I played it.

        • magic_smokeEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          2 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That’s true, I forgot about that. Their DRM was obnoxious. We already have to deal with Steam, at least that has features which improve gameplay to make up for it.