SpaceX’s Starship launches at the company’s Starbase facility near Boca Chica, Texas, have allegedly been contaminating local bodies of water with mercury for years. The news arrives in an exclusive CNBCreport on August 12, which cites internal documents and communications between local Texas regulators and the Environmental Protection Agency.

SpaceX’s fourth Starship test launch in June was its most successful so far—but the world’s largest and most powerful rocket ever built continues to wreak havoc on nearby Texas communities, wildlife, and ecosystems. But after repeated admonishments, reviews, and ignored requests, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) have had enough.

  • halcyoncmdrEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They also do that in Florida. Where many of the pads are in a conservation area. Launching from those types of areas isn’t new, rocket launches are a well known impact.

    Don’t ever see anyone talking about the NASA launch sites when these things are brought up. Always seems to be articles where the SpaceX stuff is in a vacuum and no one else launches or has launch pads to compare against.

    Not saying that contamination shouldn’t be researched, just that much of the reporting seems to have a motivation behind it that isn’t what it claims to be.

    • Atrichum
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Because NASA treats its waste water like every other sane responsible rocket company or government agency.

      • yogurt
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        They don’t treat launch water, it runs off into the wetlands through open ditches. The SRBs that the Shuttle and SLS use are 100-ton bricks of perchlorates that contaminate and acidify water for miles every time there’s a launch, so treating the direct runoff is deck chairs on the Titanic. Kennedy Space Center is already a Superfund site, so they focus on things like underwater fencing to stop KSC fish full of teflon and cadmium from being eaten by normal fish.

    • Cosmonauticus
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What about the uproar between native Hawaiians and Nasa over observatories being built on sacred native land? It’s not launch pads but Nasa has definitely pissed ppl off

      • LifeInMultipleChoice
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        So your defense is that what they are doing, someone else may have done or done something you consider equally as wrong? I don’t need to make a strawman/example/anything for you, I think you already know it is morally/ethically wrong.

      • halcyoncmdrEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I never said they didn’t piss people off. But we’re talking about concerns at a launch site. An observatory and a launch site have nearly zero in common.