Currently, almost anyone in the Fediverse can see Lemmys votes. Lemmy admins can see votes, as well as mods. Only regular Lemmy users can’t. Should the Lemmy devs create a way to make the votes anonymous?

There is a discussion going on right now considering “making the Lemmy votes public” but I think that premisse is just wrong. The votes are public already, they’re just hidden from Lemmy users. Anyone from a kbin/mbin/fedia instance can check out the votes if they are so inclined.

The users right now may fall into a false sense of privacy when voting because the votes are hidden from Lemmy users. If you want to vote something and not show up on the vote list, please create another account to support that type of content and don’t tell anyone.

  • bambooEnglish
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yep. On kbin I think any user can too.

    • BentiGorlich
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      On mbin users can only see who upvoted a post. An admin can of course still go into the db and look there, but for users and mods there is no way to see who downvoted a post

      • RedjardEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        2 months ago
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There is a “Reduces” tab on mbin, which shows downvotes

          • RedjardEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            2 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Then maybe it is still around on some instances?
            Either way, it is only a matter of time for another fediverse software to show downvotes, or someone to spin up a vote info page which gets its information via undisclosed legitimate fediverse instances so you cannot defederate them.

            • BentiGorlich
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              2 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I was actually the one removing it. I implemented the support for incoming downvotes and because I and others had concerns to keep showing remote users downvotes publicly we / I removed it.

              • RedjardEnglish
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                2 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                That’s a pretty reasonable compromise, and probably explains my confusion.
                Why didn’t you do the same for remote upvotes?

                • BentiGorlich
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Upvotes were already implemented when we did the fork. I guess we just never really thought about it. I honestly just have no opinion on whether upvotes should be public or not, so I don’t mind them being public, but I basically never check who upvoted my posts anyway, so might as well be removed If people care about this I’d say it is just up for discussion

                  • RedjardEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    In my case I would like them to be private, but currently they are not. I don’t think it is good to try to hinder the visibility into a fundamentally transparent system.

                    I don’t see a technical way to make votes private either, that doesn’t prevent bad actor instances abusing the vote system. As an admin of an instance I could just add 5-10 votes to all of my interactions whenever I feel like it, and noone would be able to tell it didn’t come from legitimate users on my instance. The accounts of vote origin are needed as proof, hence moderators on lemmy having access to them.

                    Do you perhaps have any idea how this could be accomplished?