• Cowbee [he/him]
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So far, conditions don’t seem to be pointing in Ukraines favor though. Maintaining an offensive is costly, and winter is approaching. Strategically, it could provide bargaining chips, but Russia just needs to wait it out while they maintain industrial advantages.

    It seems to me that this is ultimately not going to change the dynamic much, at the cost of Ukranian lives.

    • Skua
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I don’t think we should expect any given offensive by either side to completely overturn the whole war. A move also does not have to do that to be worthwhile. All it has to do to be worthwhile is cost Russia more than it costs Ukraine (relative to the resources available for each side). Given that Ukraine is destroying bridges, I don’t think that they intend to push much further unless a remarkable opportunity presents itself

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yes, but offensives are usually costlier than defensives. Given that Ukranian equipment has come at a far greater cost than Russian equipment, Ukraine has to be extremely careful in any engagement to not fall behind materially.

        • blarth
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Eric Schmidt just famously said that a good offense is the only good defense in war.