rhabarbatoTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·2 months agoOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseus(marc.info)external-linkarrow-up1124arrow-down12message-square10fedilink
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseus(marc.info)rhabarbatoTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·2 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squarerhabarbaOPEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·2 months agolinkfedilinkYes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
minus-squarechellomereEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down0·2 months agolinkfedilinkFor example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
minus-squarerhabarbaOPEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down0·2 months agolinkfedilinkOpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.