• Silverseren
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    I mean, even if it had done well, I feel like they would still be laying people off anyways, just to pad out their end of year revenue presentations.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Every time. Seems more like companies aren’t “hit with” them at all, more like They “get to participate” or “decide to indulge” in layoffs.

      • Silverseren
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, “hit with” has always been bizarre passive voice wording. The executives in charge were the ones who actively decided to lay off people.