• HonytawkEnglish
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    If your company can’t exist without breaking the law, then it shouldn’t exist.

    • Olgratin_MagmatoeEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      I disagree. Laws aren’t always moral. Texas could outlaw donations to the Rainbow Railroad and it would be wrong, the organization should still exist.

      But in this case it is pretty clear that the plagiarism machine is in fact, bad and should not exist, at least not in it’s current form.

      • drislandsEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it’s actually fine. Maybe that’s just semantics.

        • Olgratin_MagmatoeEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          I don’t think the people who are supporters of jury nullification are saying such laws are fine.

    • DragonTypeWyvernEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well, some laws are made to be broken, the question is whether this is one of them.