• capitalEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    We get it, y’all hate LLMs and the companies who make them.

    This comparison is disingenuous and I have to think you’re smart enough to know that, making this disinformation.

    If/when an LLM like ChatGPT spits out a full copy of training text, that’s considered a bug and is remediated fairly quickly. It’s not a feature.

    What IA was doing was sharing the full text as a feature.

    As far as I know, there are some court cases pending regarding determining if companies like Open AI are guilty of copyright infringement but I haven’t seen any convictions yet (happy to be corrected here).

    All that said, I love IA and have a Warrior container scheduled to run nightly to help contribute.

    • MigratingtoLemmyEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Hmm, true. IA wouldn’t be as supported if we couldn’t get the full text of the source.

      Can you tell me more about the “warrior container”?

    • danEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      edit-2
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      have a Warrior container

      This is an ArchiveTeam project, which is a totally separate effort to the Internet Archive. As far as I know, they’re not related other than the fact that ArchiveTeam use The Internet Archive for storage.

      • capitalEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Ahh my mistake.

        Might be time to financially contribute to IA.