Discord isn’t exactly known for generous file-sharing limits, still, the messaging app offered a 25MB limit to free users. The company has now updated its support page to reflect the upload limit for free users has been lowered to 10MB.

  • GormadtEnglish
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    It was a matter of time honestly

    • orl0plEnglish
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      You mean auto deleting?

      • Snot FlickermanEnglish
        arrow-up
        91
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        goyslop

        You gotta be fucking kidding me with this antisemitic shit.

        • NegativeInfEnglish
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ve never heard this word in my life and I somehow knew it was antisemitic?

        • GormadtEnglish
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          I recommend reporting the comment

          Definitely not the kind of shit that should be welcome in this community

          Also (after looking it up) I’m pretty sure that “goy” is a term used by jewish people to refer to non-jewish people. So in this case I think they’re saying that it is “non-jewish trash” by referring to it as “goyslop”.

          I could be wrong though, they’re pretty incoherent and it’s definitely not the kind of comment reply I wanted to see when I woke up from my nap.

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Yeah, already reported it.

            And yeah, “goyim” is anyone non-Jewish, so the implication is Jews control the world and they only give out the barest minimum of sustenance to goyim known as “goyslop.

            Like the amount of time and energy people put into these fucking slurs is ridiculous.

            • GormadtEnglish
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Ah gotcha

              On a related tangent, I think my least favorite thing about my instance is that I only see the upvotes for that terrible comment. Which it has entirely too many of.

              Honestly the amount of terrible comments and posts like that I see makes me want to switch to an instance with downvotes so that I can see that such shot isn’t popular.

              • touristEnglish
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                If it brings you any solace, Mr Raised-by-4chan is getting absolutely thundercunted with downvotes.

                Haven’t seen that many in a long while.

                • GormadtEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Happy to hear it, and also happy to see their comment disappear

        • AlkEnglish
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          It makes me happy that I don’t even know what that means. Well, I didn’t until now.

        • pandapooEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 month ago
          edit-2
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          This is one of those things where the concept is entirely appropriate and accurate, except for that one teeny tiny minor issue

          It’s not the Jews, it’s the WASPs and whatever weird Catholic sect/cult that Justice Barret was raised inokay, and yes, there’s probably some Jews in the mix as well.

          Because those are the main demographic groups of the .01%

          So what’s the WASP equivalent for goy? Heathenslop?

          Edit: I’m having a hard time imagining left-wing Jews being upset at this observation. I’m guessing at least some of these down votes are done in solidarity for people of Jewish heritage like myself.

          Sothank you and lol.

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Nah, they call them “white apps” and so since they are coming from a place of racism against whites, they feel it’s totally appropriate and okay to use a term like goyslop. It’s a shitty word to use and claiming it’s okay because you are actually racist against whites is stupid as fuck. That is still using antisemitic dog whistles. There are other ways to describe the same concept like “fast food slop.

            They think other people can’t read and don’t realize it still makes them a stupid racist.

            • pandapooEnglish
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 month ago
              edit-2
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              But the concept isn’t just about fast food, it’s about the system that produces pink slime based chicken nuggets, and the people who sit up top of that system.

              So they’ve correctly identified systemic problems that hurt people, and that those actions are done with intent, either maliciously or with indifference.

              They’ve just confused capitalism working as intended, as being a Jewish conspiracy.

              Also, “white apps” is just really bad racial propaganda. Whoever coined that term needs some new blood in their marketing team.

              Regardless of who coined that phrase, I think you’re confused about WASP’s. It means White Anglo-Saxon Protestant i.e. the largest demographic group within America’s version of old money.

        • sunzu2
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          48
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          High schooler Reading comprehension spotted.

          Melt down about one term that you didn’t like and ignore the message lol

          Either way my content speak for itsel, you could first do some basic diligence before spazzing out and trying to imply intent that ain’t there.

          We really so deserve the government we got with this genius

          Rheee

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Sorry bro, you’re the one unironically using antisemitic dogwhistles, as if you can’t get the same point across without them.

            • sunzu2
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              39
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              That is your opinion and your entitled to express yourself here but learn to read lol

              • MutilationWaveEnglish
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                your

                Somebody needs to get up on their high school education and it’s not the person you’re talking to.

                lol

              • Snot FlickermanEnglish
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                Pretty funny from someone who could learn to learn to write better and maybe describe things without needing to lean on antisemitic dogwhitles, but I mean, you obviously think you won this argument, so whatever. I’m sure your arguments about why it’s really important to use the N-word to explain your points have just about as much substance.

        • KingJalopy English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          I dunno, that was at least coherent if not incredibly dumb.

        • sunzu2
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          62
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          If Trump started saying this shit, he would get re elected

          But you don’t appear to have sufficient understanding of what I said, if you believe somebody like Trump would repeat this in public lol

      • militaryintelligenceEnglish
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Here we see the Common Incel in his natural habitat, trolling for reactions in his perpetually online state of being. Nature.

        • sunzu2
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Proper Nomanclature is “wage slave”

          Thank you :)

  • Grandwolf319English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Huh, I wonder how enshitified it has to get before I stop seeing discord on FOSS projects.

    It begins lol.

    • danEnglish
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      discord on FOSS projects

      I don’t understand why this was even a thing to begin with. FOSS projects using non-FOSS platforms is kinda weird, especially platforms with unclear financial situations like Discord.

      • KayanaEnglish
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because you don’t need to have significant experience or rent a VPS in order to do that, and I can respect that. We don’t need to force FOSS developers to become proficient in everything.

        What needs to happen is some kind of tool (ideally FOSS) that lets you spin up an actual forum with the same difficulty to set it up as Discord.

        • danEnglish
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          edit-2
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Because you don’t need to have significant experience or rent a VPS in order to do that, and I can respect that

          I’m not saying you have to self-host You could still use something that’s open-source and remotely hosted.

          Sentry (error logging and bug reporting system) is like this for example. They have a hosted plan, including a generous free plan for open-source projects, but Sentry itself is open-source.

          • namingthingsiseasyEnglish
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            That looks like a really nice policy. But my question then becomes, what happens if the company sells out someday? What if they get bought out by a larger company, or a private equity firm? Did they take funding, and if so, how much leverage do the funders have to influence them to make money and cut out programs like this?

            It’s great to see companies trying to break that trend and I highly commend them for it! But we have already seen this pattern a million times before and it always ends due to something similar to this.

      • narc0tic_birdEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        It is, but then again many (most) are hosted on GitHub.

    • KeenFlameEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      That they don’t collect as much user data is not enshittification. That is when greed kills it. They have been greedy a long time but not being able to hoard as much free user data is a good thing

  • SomeGuy69English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    It’s a big lie. Why not offer the option to delete automatically after 24h if 15mb extra is so much storage?

    Or is it about bandwidth? Why no automatic compression on desktop? Oh wait, that feature existed in the past was scrapped. They think you’re fools.

  • tronEnglish
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    I moved a big group off Discord last year to Matrix chat (Element). It’s been largely pretty alright. 100mb upload limit, we have a bot that downloads tiktoks/Instagram/reddit videos and uploads them to the channel so you never have to visit the sites. Pretty nice! Open source and federated, you guys should give it a try!

    • ArchRecordEnglish
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Matrix is nice, but it’s still very bad UX wise.

      I’ve used it on and off for years now, and about 2-4 times a month it loses my chat view encryption keys, and loses me my entire chat history. It also regularly has sync issues between devices signed into the same account, and is relatively slow sometimes to send messages.

      Of course, that’s just my anecdotal experience, but I’ve tried many messaging platforms over the years, and while Matrix (and multiple of its clients, primarily Element) is the most feature-complete compared to Discord, it’s nowhere near properly usable long-term for a mass-market audience.

      • tronEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I agree, the security key thing is a bit of an issue. However this might a bit of a user error as well. The thing to understand is that Encryption keys are not stored on Matrix.org. If they were, then Matrix.org (or whatever homeserver you’re using) would be able to decrypt everything you can decrypt, thus making Matrix pretty useless. The solution is that keys are only stored locally on your devices. Keys are shared to other devices using the Verification process and Emoji matching thing. The problem is most users just go “Whatever! And ignore the verification process and then have a bad experience because they don’t have Encryption keys.

        • ArchRecordEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          The thing is, I did have encryption keys set up. The problem was that Element would repeatedly forget the very encryption keys passed by the other user, and would then have to request the keys again. Any historical message history would be permanently encrypted forever, and wouldn’t decrypt with the new view key.

          After this happened about 4 times, I stopped using it, because it was impossible to maintain conversations for longer than 1-2 weeks before they’d inevitably be lost, and I’d then have to spend about an hour waiting for Element to receive the new encryption keys from the people I was contacting, even when they were already actively online.

          I have no clue what was causing it, but it happened on multiple accounts, on multiple devices, all the time, and there was no conceivable fix. I’m not sure if this is fixed now, but I haven’t had a good reason to go back, especially with other encrypted messaging options out there.

      • FlipperEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I don’t know how you loose your keys all the time. But in that case you really should use a key backup.

    • brbpostingEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      we have a bot that downloads tiktoks/Instagram/reddit videos and uploads them to the channel

      Would love to see the implementation!

      I like bringing stuff to the fediverse by way of cobalt.tools -> catbox.moe (shoutout Catbox for so much 100% free hotlink bandwidth) (also the owner’s trying to find a CSAM content ID solution that’s not super expensive FYI y’all)

  • Praise IdlenessEnglish
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Beware: old files sonner or later being removed is next. People use Discord like CDN(there are even bunch of clients for that usage) and that is never going to work indefinitely. Honestly, it’s very impressive that deletion wasn’t their first choice.

    • ArchRecordEnglish
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Same here, honestly. I would have thought they’d say something like “hey, we’re going to delete anything 1 year or older starting next month, and reduce that amount slowly down to 6 months with time” just to give people a general warning in case there was anything they were storing through Discord that they wanted to keep.

      There’s also just a ton of optimizations they could have done. Are people repeatedly uploading the same file, with the same name and contents? merge them into one CDN link. They’d probably save hundreds of terabytes of data just from reposted memes alone through a hash matching algorithm.

      • Pasta DentalEnglish
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I mean couldn’t they just move the old files from the hot CDN to cold storage? I bet the few people that go check at old messages care that much about the loading speed of a screenshot. And honestly I think PR wise deleting memories from people makes for worse article titles than smaller files

        • ArchRecordEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          I suppose they could, but even cold storage has a cost, and with the scale Discord’s operating at, they definitely have many terabytes of data that comes into the CDN every day, and that cost adds up if you’re storing it permanently.

          I also think the vast majority of users would prefer being able to upload much higher resolution images and videos, to being able to see the image they sent with their messages a year ago. I don’t often go back through my messages, but I often find myself compressing or lowering the quality of the things I’m uploading on a regular basis.

          They could also do the other common sense thing, which is to, on the client side of things, compress images and videos before sending them.

  • webghost0101English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 month ago
    edit-2
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    25 MB wasn’t even enough to send a single full res screenshot of my desktop.

    Its 2024 and we still lack the basic functionality of file sharing between peers without a corp dictator restricting and snooping.

    Not that the functionality does not exist (p2p, literally) but if my grandma cant receive the family pictures its not basic.

    EDIT: it is possible i am remembering this from when it was 8MB.

    Empty desktop is just a few kb but it was not that hard to open enough stuff to exceed 10MB

    Til that i have been sending screenshots of only half my screen for not reason

    • catloafEnglish
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      That sounds like a you problem, because a PNG screenshot of my full 5120x1440 desktop is about 850 kB.

      • webghost0101English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Interesting. Mine is 3840x1600 which should be ever so slightly less pixels.

        I have noticed the content does matter, is your background native resolution or mostly one color?

        • barsoapEnglish
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          3840 * 1600 * 4B / 1024 / 1024 = 23.4375MiB for uncompressed RGBA (four bytes per pixel).

          That is, even if that thing was pure random pixels and would have to be stored uncompressed and you’d use a completely useless alpha channel you still don’t hit 25M.

          • ramble81English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Guys out here sending BMPs

          • webghost0101English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            I did some test, i was speaking from memory.

            it depends on whats on screen.

            Just desktop is 128kb but irl that rarely what i send to people.

            Just my game launcher will bump that up to 5MB

            But the 100% real experience i have is that is try to show someone a screenshot and i get a message that files are “too powerful” so i have conditioned myself to only show the relevant half of my screen.

            So either that 25MB was a lie or i do frequently exceed it?

        • catloafEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          I specifically opened a few apps to break up any large blocks of one color.

    • stealth_cookiesEnglish
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      That makes no sense. The 24MP RAW files from my camera at 25MB, no way a PNG or JPEG of a 4K (8MP) monitor are anywhere close to that big.

      • webghost0101English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I did some test, i was speaking from memory so not very accurate.

        it depends on whats on screen.

        Just desktop is 128kb but irl that rarely what i send to people.

        Just my game launcher will bump that up to 5MB

        But the 100% real experience i have is that is try to show someone a screenshot and i get a message that file size is to big so i have conditioned myself to only show the relevant half of my screen.

    • emax_gomaxEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      I kinda wish we could go back to the world of people hosting their own servers and having subsets of their homedirs on ftp urls. Of course none of that is really approachable to a lot of a people :-(.

      • NaoPbEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I am considering this. I am just looking into what uses the least power.

        • darvitEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          You can easily use something like a raspberry pi (or something else ARM-based like Friendlyelec CM3588) and attach some storage to it. It’s really not difficult to setup a web server to share a directory.

          • NaoPbEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Thanks, I will be looking into these.

    • KairosEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      The issue is the absence of being able to port forward in a lot of places. UPNP exists on some networks but it’s usually disabled. But if we want actual peer to peer we’re going to need to implement some way to accept incoming connections EVERYWHERE.

          • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            it doesn’t need NAT topology, at all. There is literally zero reason to use it. Direct P2P networking is so much easier over ipv6

            • KairosEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Huh. I did not know that.

              • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                yeah, under IPv6 based home networking, you just assign a block of addresses to a home, 512 or something, for example, and then you just use a stateful firewall to do the same exact thing that a NAT + a stateful firewall would be doing on a traditional IPv4 network.

                Nothing stops you from using a NAT if you felt like you wanted your networking to be more complicated for no reason. But you probably shouldn’t.

                There are potential benefits for the anonymization of traffic (though this is probably easy enough to defeat by simply sniffing for all traffic across the IP block) a denial of service wouldn’t be super important anymore, as you could just engage in round robin across the other IPs, unless of course you DOS’d every IP all at once, but that would be super fucking obvious and trivial to deal with. Though it might kill an individual computer in the network due to traffic influx.

                You could still engage in DHCP IP handouts, which would actually be beneficial in terms of traffic anonymization in this case. Especially on a high frequency basis. Similar to the effects of NATing on an IPv4 network.

                Plus you could still grab a static IP address per device, and then just pass through firewall rules to allow external connections or whatever you please. No forwarding required.

      • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        IF ONLY WE COULD USE IPV6 WE WOULDNT BE HAVING THIS PROBLEM

        YES FUCK YOU TOO COMCAST.

        • StrykkerEnglish
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Gonna be real here, I’m in tech, there is no fucking way I’m gonna open my PC to the entire fucking internet. Vulnerabilities are everywhere and no code is perfect. Firewalls and nat help stop so many attacks from the start.

          Even if ipv6 is common I will assume most implementations will be nat based.

          • FrederikNJSEnglish
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            IPv6 does not require you to open your machine to the Internet, even without making use of a NAT. Sure you get an IP that’s valid on the whole internet, but that doesn’t mean that anyone can send you traffic.

          • MaxEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            You definitely use a firewall, but there’s no need for NAT in almost all cases with ipv6. But even with a firewall, p2p becomes easier even if you still have to do firewall hole punching

          • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            brother, use a firewall. NAT does nothing for this, a single stateful firewall will do more for device security than a NAT existing solely by itself.

            A nat doesn’t even do anything other than provide some basic level of device anonymity. If you didn’t have a firewall it would still be accessible, you would just need to either be really good at guessing ports, or sniff for traffic that’s relevant lol.

            • StrykkerEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago
              edit-2
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Except the NAT device will stonewall traffic on every port except the ones I open, for my entire network, and then I can just worry about securing the software listening on those few ports, instead of having to worry about the firewalls on every device I own.

              Tldr default nat behavior is a state full firewall.

              • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago
                edit-2
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                that’s literally what a stateful firewall does.

                It only allows corresponding return traffic to outgoing traffic that a device has internally sent outwards.

                if you disabled that, it wouldn’t do that. But even a NAT without a stateful firewall might end up doing this depending on how it’s configured and your open ports due to how the forwarding is handled. This is how we get around NATing for P2P traffic, though the trick is to just send two NATed users to the others ip and port at the same time to establish a connection that can “isAlive” from there. If you had no firewall you would only need to know the IP and port to do this.

                plus not to mention you can run internal firewalls on each device specifically which would do basically the same thing anyway. But then again i don’t use windows so that’s way easier.

                • StrykkerEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Yes, thank you for repeating what I just said, and justifying my desire for a nat. I do infact actually know a few things about computer networks and tcp/ip since I spent 7 years writing software to interface with and monitor them.

        • ArcherEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Comcast is one of the biggest IPv6 ISPs though?

      • Great Blue HeronEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Once an end-to-end, encrypted, connection is established between a pair of peers then anything can be sent through it. The establishment proces is generally facilitated by a server of some description so neither peer needs to allow inbound connections. (I’m a long, long way from being an expert on this and happy to be corrected - but this seems like network fundamentals?)

        • KillingTimeItselfEnglish
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          this is true, but the problem is that it’s really complicated, and not always reliable. Mostly due to NATing within the networks. Firewalls don’t help but you can get around those easily enough.

          There’s no guarantee that you’ll get a reliable P2P network connection over a NAT unless one peer isn’t NATed. Which is unlikely.

          TL;DR we would probably ddos the internet very quickly if we tried at the scale of something like discord.

        • webghost0101English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Firefox: Browser missing required feature. This application needs support for WebSockets, WebRTC, and WebAssembly.

          • AbidanYreEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Where do you see that? I just sent a file from Firefox on Debian to Vivaldi on Android with it to test.

            There’s also just plain wormhole (https://github.com/magic-wormhole/magic-wormhole) as an application for Windows, Mac, and Linux if that web instance doesn’t work.

    • randombulletEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      No way 3,840 × 2,160x2=16,588,800 pixels 16,588,800 x 10 bits = 165,888,000 bits

      165,888,000 bits / 8 bits/byte = 20,736,000 bytes

      • webghost0101English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        See my edit.

        I am probably remembering this from when the limit was 8MB, which cant be that long ago i only own this monitor for a year.

    • dezmdEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Reimplement the old WASTE client from the Nullsoft dude, this time with proper encryption and security and let’s call it a day.

    • danEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Not that the functionality does not exist (p2p, literally) but if my grandma cant receive the family pictures its not basic.

      What about encrypted messaging apps? Maybe your grandma can’t figure out Signal, but she could probably work out how to use WhatsApp (which uses the same encryption protocol) given how popular it is in some countries.

      • webghost0101English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Whatsapp is a product of Meta and files would still pass their proprietary servers. Let alone the metadata they collect. I refuse to use Facebook related products on principle. (Mostly stopped using google and microsoft products also)

        Singal can do actual p2p userdevice to userdevice. Only if thats not possible it will use temporary servers for storage. But i am actually against that, id prefer if the file would not send until a p2p connection is established.

        On paper the encryption of whatsapp is about as secure as Signal but can we trust Facebook to not implement a backdoor?. There open source llm-ai (llama) is by far the most intelligent model for its size. I plore people to ask what data Meta used to archive that result.

  • Alpha71English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Could anyone explain the attraction of discord? To me it’s UX is atrocious.

    • GhostedICEnglish
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Discord got big in online gaming because they offered a VOIP and text chat browser cliemt. Just copy or type the short link and you’re in in a minute. They also did free hosting which was huge.

      Compared to Teamspeak or Ventrilo, literally just eliminating the steps of downloading a client, installing it, and typing in an IP address caused them to explode overnight. Also you could “host” without changing router settings (most kids/students have to ask their parents or jump through hoops for this).

      Technically there was stuff like Skype but that never had the convenient team speak style chat rooms to drop in and out of freely.

      Within months of suddenly getting popular, discord had a huge userbase that everybody was using already, and that momentum got us to the point where in some aspects its even replacing the role of wiki’s and forums even though its terrible at it.

      • popEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Also I remember while teamspeak was paid, discord was free.

        • Saik0English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Eh. There were free licenses. As long as you could show you weren’t using it commercially.

    • ayyyEnglish
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      There’s no open source equivalent that does seamless audio and video streaming on every platform.

    • superglueEnglish
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Its really convenient if you’ve got a group of friends spread out across the country for gaming. The voice channels allow people to jump in and out at will. No calling each other. That and bots are really eady to build for it. Sure its all unencrypted but im not putting anything of real value into it.

      • UnderpantsWeevilEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        The NSA agent assigned to monitor me has a character on my Foundry instance.

    • addieEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      We’ve found it to be the “least bad option” for DnD. Have a Discord window open for everyone to video chat in, have a browser window open with Owlbear Rodeo or Foundry / Forge for your tokens and character sheets, all works smoothly enough. The text chat is sufficient for sending the DM a private message; for group chat to share art of the things you’ve just run into or organise the next session.

      Completely agree that for anything “less transient”, then the UX is beyond awful and trying to find anything historical is a massive PITA.

      • UnderpantsWeevilEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Google Whiteboard could have been better. Hell, I can think of a dozen apps in the Google graveyard that could have been better.

        But Discord still exists and they don’t, so

    • CorkyskogEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s the place where things like game communities use primarily for instant chat.

    • KandaEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      My dumbass friends who work in tech thought IRC was too much of a hassle. So we ended up on dickschord

      • ZiemekZEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        You know that IRC has waaaaay less features, right?

        • KandaEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah but we’ve only used text for years now, so go doodle your features

          • ZiemekZEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            we’ve only used text for years now

            Speak for yourself, I send quite a bunch of pictures and so do plenty of users

    • SwampmanEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Back in 2016 I managed to get all of my gaming friends on discord simply by saying “It’s like Skype but it doesn’t suck”

      We simply needed something that worked and let us do voip calls without having to jump through the hoops of setting up ventrilo, mumble or teamspeak. Skype was so aggressively bad that any alternative was like finding a waterpark in the middle of the desert.

    • BruceTwarzenEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      I don’t get it either. They aggressively try to sell nitro, they have ads embedded in their ui. I have no idea why people don’t hate it.

      • thermal_shockEnglish
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        they didn’t 5 years ago. enshittification at its finest.

  • Snot FlickermanEnglish
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    59
    ·
    1 month ago
    edit-2
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Discord continues down it’s path to total enshittification, which is exactly what I told everyone would happen when this fucking dogshit app got pushed on me around 2018 or so.

    It’s a private company with a profit motive. Fucking shocker that it enshittifies. /s

    Fucking dipshit gamers not knowing any better.

    I was promoting Matrix/Riot.IM (now Element) and nobody gave a shit because it was too hard to use even though it mostly has the same interface as Discord. (Which, by the way, fuck this interface.)

    • simpleEnglish
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      What an overreaction. Also FYI the free file limit was 8MB two years ago before they raised the limit to 25MB, so if anything it’s gotten better.

    • rand_alpha19
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Anything that wants to meaningfully compete with Discord will probably also need to be able to near-seamlessly port over existing Discord servers to the new platform, since it’s so established now. Is there a competitor that can do that?

      • TjaEnglish
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m completely out of the loop, so I might as well ask you: where is discord so established? Never used it in my life. I used IRC, ICQ and MSN in their time. Now for work Slack, teams and zoom. Signal and Telegram privately. Email for everything.

        What am I missing? What does discord provide?

        • NateSwiftEnglish
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Discord is used a lot for gaming groups, modding, software development, and has largely replaced forums for lots of niche communities

          • zelifcamEnglish
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Which is unfortunate. Hiding projects, code and support behind discord is just wrong.

            There are Linux and open source communities on discord. I mean, just think about that for a second. These people have chosen to put their stuff on a platform that has refused to acknowledge the existence of their OS / development platform. Every other post on Reddit in the Linux community before I left was about some half assed discord workaround.

        • rand_alpha19
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Unfortunately, a lot of fandom communities, video games, and (ugh) hobbyist development projects have Discard servers instead of a forum or similar.

          It provides a weird IRC-but-not-really type experience that is similar to MSN in some ways. A lot of younger people flock to it because they find computer stuff difficult and they just want it to work, be easy, and have an app. The UI is trendy even though it’s horrible to actually navigate due to all the wasted space and buttons.

          I really just think it caught on at the right time, though the video calling is pretty good. What I have a problem with is that you need to join a server to access any information inside of it, so it’s not searchable from outside of the Discord ecosystem. For dev projects or large communities, that sucks and makes the internet a worse place.

          • blackbelt352English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Personally I originally went to Discord because it was the alternative to skype which was increasingly becoming shittier and shittier when Microsoft bought it.

            • greenskyeEnglish
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Discord is great as chat program. It should’ve only ever been used for that. It completely sucks as forum replacement. Discord should’ve had very little value to any decent organization.

            • rand_alpha19
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Yes, that’s how I ended up there too. At the time, Skype sucked and Mumble/Ventrilo/etc. were seen as too old-school for my friends (and a lot of them didn’t have PCs, just smartphones). We also tried Google Meet, Zoom, and Facebook Messenger at various points but Discord always seemed like the most reliable.

          • vithigarEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            I have a hobby development project with a modest community and maintain a Discord server basically because it’s necessary in order to avoid reducing my potential community reach by at least 50%.

            I’m active on GitHub and respond to comments and issues there. I maintain an official thread for my project on the official forum for the game it’s related to. I also keep all documentation, downloads, and guides off Discord and on the clearnet. Discord is still easily 80% or more of where people look for information about the project.

            • rand_alpha19
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              That’s great - I am obviously not talking about you in that case. I understand why people want to use it, I just don’t think Discord’s features are good enough to justify the mass adoption and the walled garden and UI are bad.

              • vithigarEnglish
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                Yeah, I’m just sort of also complaining because it feels like I have to use it.

        • greenskyeEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Every single small game I play has effectively the entirety of their support, community and forums run through discord. Instead of easy to search and discover forums, I have to use crappy infinite chat logs. It sucks.

        • SouthFreshEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          ICQ

          You sure about that part? I thought they shut down. I guess they might have some user-based servers?

          • fuzzy_feelingEnglish
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            if you read the whole sentence it might make more sense

            i used [] in their time.

            • SouthFreshEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Whoops, I certainly missed that. Thank you!

        • yeahiknow3English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago
          edit-2
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Discord is fashionable. That’s it. The whole app is fantastically impractical if you want to use file or screen sharing. It’s just a bunch of gamers circle-jerking each other, which is a perfect way to keep them from infesting the rest of the internet.

      • Snot FlickermanEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 month ago
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Is there a competitor that can do that?

        I say this with all due respect: Who gives a shit? If you were foolish enough to dump your entire community into Discord alone and don’t have an off-ramp, that’s your own fucking problem.

        EDIT: Also, Matrix already has a bridge for Discord and has for a while:

        https://matrix.org/ecosystem/bridges/discord/

        • rand_alpha19
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Who gives a shit? The people who use it that you apparently want to switch to something else, for one. Shouldn’t it be easy to switch, like going from Chrome to Firefox? That’s how we get out of Discord hell.

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Shouldn’t it be easy to switch, like going from Chrome to Firefox?

            Say you have no idea how any of this works without saying you have no idea how any of this works.

            That’s how we get out of Discord hell.

            Why is it our job to fix the problems of a private, profit-focused company?

            • rand_alpha19
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              We’re not fixing Discord’s problems, oh my god. We’re trying to get their existing users to go somewhere else even though it’s what’s familiar and Discord works for them.

              Also it’s definitely possible to code an import tool that scrapes a given server for info on how to structure things on the new platform, so idk what you think you’re gaining by insulting my comparison to an aspect of a service that makes users motivated to switch.

              I don’t know who shat in your coffee, but get a fucking new cup.

              • GormadtEnglish
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                Honestly the onboarding for a lot of alternatives to various to popular platforms/apps (Matrix, Mastodon, etc) seems to be the biggest impediment to more adoption of those platforms and apps.

                By onboarding here I mean the communities that use those platforms recruiting others to join them and help build communities up.

                Like goddamn if that users comment was the first time I’d heard of Matrix it would have turned me away for sure.

                Not to mention Mastodon having a reputation that proceeds it.

                • rand_alpha19
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Yes, exactly! At this point, some of these communities have been on Discord for years and have specialized bots for certain tasks. They don’t want to start over, and I don’t want them to either - there’s tons of real work that these communities have put in. I think that these messaging services that want to make headway in the space Discord occupies need to reduce the friction in switching because a lot of Discord admins do believe that the feature set is better, they just can’t easily move over.

                  This happens to organizations all the time and it’s a known issue - Discord communities are no different. I’m hoping something comes along in the next few years if it doesn’t already exist in its infancy right now. Even at the user level, I know many people are confused about Matrix. I don’t know how exactly to fix these issues, but they need to be priorities.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauceEnglish
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Ok but why are you so angry about it?

      I’ve been using it for years and haven’t had to pay a dime.

      How have they harmed you with their free app?

      • Snot FlickermanEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 month ago
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because if you didn’t expect this path when you signed up you were naive.

        Now everyone complains about it but for people who had already been paying attention: this was par for the course. Of course this was going to be the outcome. Why should I be happy that everyone fell for the promises of a for-profit private company again?

        Like why do you think we are on Lemmy for fucks sake? Is it not for the same reasons??

        How many times do we have to be fucked by private corporations for people to learn they don’t care about us?

        But every time its all “but they have a better feature set so its okay that they might enshittify in the long-run! Literally same shit is being said about Bluesky over Mastodon right now. Bluesky being a Public Benefit Corporation means about as much as OpenAI being a non-profit.

        • CarbonatedPastaSauceEnglish
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          You didn’t even come close to answering the question. So I’ll ask again.

          How were you harmed by Discord?

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            That wooshing sound you hear over your head is you willfully missing the point entirely.

            Like why do you think we are on Lemmy for fucks sake? Is it not for the same reasons??

            *woosh

        • AwesomeLowlanderEnglish
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago
          edit-2
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          The problem being, there aren’t many alternatives around for discord. And even the ones that exist have issues of their own. Mostly relating to use base and entry barrier, in the case of the open source alternatives.

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 month ago
            edit-2
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            No, literally the problem is most people would rather give in and use a sleek corporate option every time.

            No matter how many times they get fucked by doing that.

            It’s a choice to keep getting fucked.

            • IsThisAnAIEnglish
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Lololol y’all are insane.

              I’ve been using discord for free for like 8 years now. But now I can only share 10mb files and I’M FUCKED 🤣

              So much entitlement.

                • IsThisAnAIEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  No one is preventing you from using Skype. You are unhinged over discord 🤣.

                  Incredibly weird.

    • ArchRecordEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Look, I’m as upset as you are about the enshittification of everything, but this is a bit too far.

      There was always legitimate issues with Discord’s storage management, and they at least seem to be taking it seriously now.

      I’m not a massive fan of Discord, but this is a bit of an overreaction.

    • IsThisAnAIEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      LITERALLY UNUSABLE 🤣🤣🤣🤣

      Discord is fine for 99% of users.

    • yeahiknow3English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 month ago
      edit-2
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      The people downvoting you are the ones who eat up the enshittificaion. Discord is unusable for anyone who wants file or screen sharing. Skype, by contrast, has screen sharing that’s smoother and higher quality, and a file sharing limit of 300mb, all free for the last decade.

      But yeah most users are barely computer literate so Discord keeps humming along.

      • semEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Skype was annoying to use and so is element

      • Snot FlickermanEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Oh, I know. It’s squarely aimed at fucking tools who don’t even own a PC, which is why it has that “mobile first” design ethos even though their mobile apps are absolute trash.

        It doesn’t matter how many times this happens, people would rather get fucked by corpos than spend time learning anything.

  • CorhenEnglish
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Unlike other platforms, we store your files for as long as you need them, so it is crucial that we manage our storage sustainably

    I mean, its great that they offer that, but all my files dont need to be permemnant. I would love the ability to review and delete old files

    • GaMEChldEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah, makes no sense that they store some pdf I was dragging over to someone one time. Super inefficient. They should allocate an amount of storage per user that then rolls and deletes the oldest files when the cap gets exceeded to make room for the new files.

      • KeenFlameEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s probably because it’s their property now and personal data is precious

        • GaMEChldEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          edit-2
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Maybe, but then they’d want more data, not complaining about needing to limit it. Or maybe it’s just because they want lots of small files like text, and not waste it on inefficient sound and video files.

          • KeenFlameEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            They want more data and literally can’t store it efficiently enough. You can read their eula and see, they instantly own anything you upload and you no longer have rights to it, which is absolutely bonkers and pretty dubious in many countries if this is even legal. We found out when they overviewed the security of our studio and we use other communication software now because of it. They could literally argue that they own the assets to the games we make if we send concepts to each other.

            • GaMEChldEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Hmm, I wonder if they would get in trouble if someone uploaded child porn to their servers.

  • BrutticusEnglish
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    I primarily use Discord as a one stop shop to play and run dnd campaigns. I first hopped on it around 2017, and its was way better than any other group chat app. Around the pandemic all my groups started playing on it and it became relatively seamless. I joined exactly one streamers discord but that is totally it. In general I wouldn’t expect it to be a good archive, or forum, nor do I expect it to be secure. I use armchord on PC. I started using it before it was enshittified. For what it does, it does it pretty well.

    For the record, I have used matrix and Signal. I think both have the issue that a critical mass of my friends don’t use them. I liked Signal a lot when it had SMS support. I used it as a my primary SMS app, and some of my friends had signal as well, so that was cool. now its more like a specialized messenger app, and I fucking hate having yet another one of those on my phone. Matrix encryption keys are giant stumbling blocks to my friends who do give a fuck. I play ttrpgs with some people who could not give a fuck. I would have to set up the server, set up the account, and then I would have have to do the encryption key for them. And like people say, Matrix logs you out every little while. You can turn notifications off and totally forget about it. For my non techy friends, this is literally a bridge too far.

    I literally have two friends who think Matrix is cool. No one else even has an account, much less a server. And the support to meet people who have this app is very limited. Cool, but I think it will always be a niche.

    • essteeyouEnglish
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      edit-2
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      It took me a lot of convincing to get my friends on Signal instead of WhatsApp. I believe WhatsApp was talking about adding advertising or charging money, and I used that to get people to switch.

      This reminds me of the argument I see from Linux users that Linux is just as easy to set up as Windows. I think it doesn’t occur to people making that argument that most people never even set up Windows. It’s just on their computer when they get it.

      The setup needs to be fast and easy for people to consider it. Nobody will spend even 5 minutes figuring something out these days.

      Edit to add that a bunch of younger people have never had a computer or laptop. They do their computer stuff on a phone or possibly a tablet and they definitely never did anything technical like reinstall the OS.

      • njordomirEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        How do you understand this without falling into the defeatist mindset that the sheeple deserve to be imprisoned in the state of enshitification that their ignorance, laziness, and unwillingness to learn has helped build? Put down your iPhone, or go check into your local FEMA camp. I hate to be negative like this, but people really seem to be willing to give up everything for convenience and bling.

        • essteeyouEnglish
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          esstee

          People can choose what to spend their time doing. Some of us choose to be able to install operating systems, other choose to become master gardeners. Who’s to say which one is right or wrong? The gardeners probably don’t have any issues using WhatsApp, even if there is advertising in it, because it solves the problem they have. Then they go back to the thing they’re experts at instead, saying things like “why can’t these tech sheeple grow a radish? send them all to jail.

          • joel_feilaEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            You dont have to be an expert, i barely know anything about the kinux cli but i still use linux daily

            • essteeyouEnglish
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              link
              fedilink

              Most people have never installed an operating system, and I’ve never seen a laptop running Linux for sale at Best Buy or wherever, so there’s a huge barrier for entry for the average person.

              I’m sure most people would be fine with Linux day to day if it was set up for them, but they’re not going to download an ISO, boot from it, and install an OS if they don’t have to.

              These same people, to stick with my example, might grow delicious tomatoes, better than those you buy at the supermarket. Can anyone grow some tomatoes? Pretty much. Does anyone really have to? No.

  • DogEnglish
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Well, it is better than 8, but still sad.

  • XylightEnglish
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    A feature that’s be nice is giving you a higher upload limit if you make your upload temporary.

    • UnderpantsWeevilEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Or let you host from your own machine, rather than paying Discord for the privilege of using their wildly overpriced services.

      • immutableEnglish
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Hosting the image on discords CDN allows you not to give out your IP address to any person that comes across the link, prevents you from getting hammered with download requests if your upload becomes popular, and allows your content to be accessed when your own machine goes to sleep or has any kind of networking interruption.

        Before discord people used to self host teamspeak or some other software. One of the big things you don’t have to think about is the person you just made a joke about or beat in an online game trying to DDOS your machine, because they don’t know where you are.

        • UnderpantsWeevilEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          Hosting the image on discords CDN allows you not to give out your IP address to any person that comes across the link

          You don’t need the whole image, just the route to your machine to retrieve the data. Glorified Bit.ly.

          One of the big things you don’t have to think about is the person you just made a joke about or beat in an online game trying to DDOS your machine

          Definitely a perk of a bulk centralized system. But the pricing model is still messed up. If Teamspeak sold you gems to buy widgets to mask your IP, I still wouldn’t pay for the service.

      • DacoTacoEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        I hate discord a lot, but this feature kinda destroys the reason discord exists. We used to have irc which is direct communication and needs both systems to be online ( yes, bouncers exist, but they arent perfect ). We moved away from irc so systems didnt need to be online and it was all in the cloud. Direct communication/file sharing from pc would kinda revert all that lol

        ( lets gooooo, bring irc back :p )

  • kunehoEnglish
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    on mobile it’s just a huge pile of stinky shit anyway

    • PersenEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago
      edit-2
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      *everywhere

      Just use signal or any e2e instant messanger instead of it.

  • umbrellaEnglish
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    the enshitification will go faster now i bet

    • KeenFlameEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      They want your data, everything you upload to discord belongs to that corporation. Corporations do not have souls

  • FadesEnglish
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    are you fucking kidding me?? TEN MB IN 20 FUCKING 24.

    Discord is such fuckin TRASH

    • njordomirEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      I was a member of a number of groups in a larger gaming community most of which migrated from Reddit/Mumble to Discord. It destroyed the quality and accessibility of written content and lore and I wish it had never happened. Then again, we can’t go back to reddit at this point either.

      Guess I’ll be posting my screenshots in 640x480 from now on!

    • anneiamEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      Being part of multiple servers becomes such a painful experience with that interfaceeven with the “folders” and the search palette.