On so many different news items, threads, etc. People are the first to claim pretty much anyone who has made a mistake, or does something they disagree with deserves to die.

Like, do some people not have the capability to empathise and realise they might have been in a similar place if they were born in a different environment

I genuinely understand, you think a politician who has lead to countless deaths, a war criminal, or a mass rapists deserves to die.

But here people say it for stuff that falls way below the bar.

A contracted logger of a rainforest (who knows if they have the money / opportunity to support their family another way). Deserves to die.

A civilian of Nazi germany of whom we know nothing about their collaboration/agreement with the regime. Deserves to die.

Some person who was a drug dealer and then served their time. Deserves to die.

Like I don’t get it? Are people not able to imagine the kind of situations that create these people, and that it’s not impossible to imagine the large majority of people in these positions if born in a different environment?

  • metaStatic
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    that’s a good way to construct an echo chamber and not notice that you’re no longer the majority and now society has lowered the bar for murder to include you.

    • ProdigalFrogEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      link
      fedilink

      “If we block the people calling for death, they’ll kill us! 😵

      • metaStatic
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        They look around and only see support so they must be right .

        Because ignoring problems has worked so well in the past

        • Random123
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          While i agree with your sentiment it really depends on the user. While you may be open to calling out bullshit violent users, perhaps this user has no intention to do the same and would prefer a more chill virtual environment

          • Admiral PatrickEnglish
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            Yep. Plus, people spewing violent bullshit aren’t going to be deterred by a counter keyboard warrior. So I just let them shout their shit into the void (as far as I’m aware of it, anyway).

            I’ve got enough stress IRL I don’t need that shit here.

        • BowtiesAreCool
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          link
          fedilink

          And allowing all of these people unchecked in your discourse allows them to keep going and gain steam. If more people blocked psychos maybe they’d shut up when they realise no one is listening