• papertowels
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    edit-2
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    Humor me here.

    My assumption is that steams main goal is to provide paying users with good service by minimizing hackers, and second to that, provide QOL features like family share.

    Do you agree with that assumption? If not, what do you think the priorities are?

    If you do agree with the assumption, what would you have done differently to accommodate both those priorities and your complaint?

    • x00zaEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      edit-2
      3 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Removed by mod

      • papertowels
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        Valve could have just banned the account that was actually cheating, send a mail to the owner, and let them disable the sharing. Punish after.

        So what if a hacker just makes a new account, and adds that to the family and continues ruining the experience of others?

        • x00zaEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 month ago
          edit-2
          3 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Removed by mod

          • papertowels
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            link
            fedilink

            So your proposed solution would let hackers make indefinite new accounts and add them as family. Do you see a problem with that?

            If not, I hope you’re done talking to me, lol.

            • x00zaEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 month ago
              edit-2
              3 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              Removed by mod

              • papertowels
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 month ago
                link
                fedilink

                A well thought out and conveyed response to the concern about hackers. Valve should implement your plan pronto.

                • x00zaEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Removed by mod

                  • papertowels
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Nor do I even have to be the one to come up with a plan.

                    People that just complain without a better improvement in mind didn’t actually care to change anything, because they’ve haven’t shown that there’s a reasonable alternative. Those people don’t care if there’s a practical alternative, they’re just upset that it doesn’t meet their specific needs. They just want to “speak to the manager” and complain. “It’s not my job to fix it! Fix it!. If that’s quote captures your stance, just lmk and it will save us both some time.

                    I actually even already gave a simple plan and you ignored it.

                    I didn’t ignore it, I asked how it would deal with a fundamental enforcement of rules that steam has always done and you’ve ignored that, lol. Are you here to just complain or do you actually want to see if there’s a better way forward? What’s a feasible alternative to handle hackers and provide quality of life improvements like family sharing?

                    Your arguments that hackers are more important than a parent with a kid are selfish and stupid.

                    I’d argue that hackers are more important to valve because they implemented VAC bans almost 20 years ago. They just now announced a family sharing feature and you’re pretending that steam was meant to be designed around the family to start, which is an uphill battle to argue.

                    And force Valve to ruin it for the rest of us.

                    First of all, it’s already implemented this way. You’re the one arguing for an alternative that could increase the number of hackers - if anyone is trying to force valve to ruin it “for the rest of us”, it’s you, since you’re arguing to change the status quo.

                    Finally, don’t want valve to “ruin” it for you? Don’t use the brand new opt in feature. You have lost absolutely nothing - nothing has been “ruined”.